[NCSG-PC] EPDP Membership Composition Options

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi,

thanks, Ayden for the document.
one problem with option 6 is that the council composition will change with
the election for the different groups. another issue is that doesn't take
into consideration the expertise expected for this topic and may put more
workload on the council. the council was more involved in policy doing
before but that was found problematic and that is why we got this
separation between policy making and policy management. Moreover, the
council leadership itself will change as Heather and Donna are term-limited
and we have no idea who will replace them.

I think most of the options take into account the composition issue and try
to resolve it based on the experience from RDS WG. I think the CCWG minus
(should be renamed as CCWG can be misleading) can be acceptable allowing us
to appoint our experts who can commit time and focus on the issue. I
understand we can argue about the number of representatives and the right
size for the group (what can be the right number for "small"?)but at the
end what matters is being consistent in term of participation from our side
and being strategical.
no idea what can be an option 7 and how much we can be creative. it may be
even counter-productive without knowing other SG/C reactions. Anyway,
everything is open for now.

Best,

Rafik

Le lun. 28 mai 2018 à 03:38, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> a écrit :

> So on our recent PC call, Farzaneh suggested that we create a spreadsheet
> and list the positives and negatives of all of the different ePDP
> composition options. I've created a Google Doc now, and would encourage you
> to help populate it with more positive/negatives.
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1X0aPWrZHzRNRoZgwByDK-NdzE9E-R8HddbD2pVJVBx0/edit?usp=sharing
>
> I like Option 6 (Committee of the Whole); I think that would work well for
> us, in terms of representation - except that we lose Stephanie in a few
> months, as she is term limited on the Council, and we would therefore lose
> our most powerful voice on this topic.
>
> But, above are the options, and we can even propose an Option 7...
>
> Ayden
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180528/5694841c/attachment.htm>