[NCSG-PC] Preliminary comments on WHOIS Review 2 agreements

[Stephanie Perrin]

Thanks Ayden and Fik, I shall push with renewed vigour :-)  We now have 
till Friday COB if anyone thinks of specific issues...

SP

On 2018-05-03 05:26, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
> I think you are being too diplomatic in there, Stephanie.
>
> Please don't give the RT the option to reject your comments; please 
> insist that your two-pager objecting to Recommendation #2 be 
> included... we cannot let this RT whitewash the situation.
>
> Thanks for all that you do,
>
> Ayden
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On 2 May 2018 8:47 PM, Stephanie Perrin 
> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>
>> Attached are my preliminary comments on the WHOIS review team 2 
>> initial findings.  This is the rollup of the subgroups work, which we 
>> recently discussed in Brussels.  I objected strenuously to one item, 
>> that the Board had delivered on its responsibilities re a policy.  I 
>> think the EWG was a violation of the MS process, the failure of the 
>> RDS was a failure of ICANN as a whole (not the GNSO as Alan G claims) 
>> and that the Board initiated interim policy is a fundamental failure 
>> of the MS process.....
>>
>> anyway I have asked for more time, which I doubt the Chair will 
>> grant.  Volker, who did not attend the meeting, has not had time to 
>> go over it.  He is the only contracted party there (there are 3 GAC 
>> members) and they have to live with all our recommendations, which I 
>> find fundamentally wrong.
>>
>> Let me know if you have comments, I will push to get them added.  
>> They are rushing this through when we are all GDPRing....
>>
>> cheers Steph
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180503/fcd5fe28/attachment.htm>