<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">Thanks Ayden and Fik,
I shall push with renewed vigour :-) We now have till Friday
COB if anyone thinks of specific issues...</font></font></p>
<p><font size="+1"><font face="Lucida Grande">SP</font></font><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2018-05-03 05:26, Ayden Férdeline
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:QXSRlP5rMKAcut2uBx5teM91IjYpUdPg058JKhoKp9m79OklbHWAwbYJ2EDFTqqRUChaJByKvPWsvSqmNP39Yd8l4N91MBV-VpRSwT_v3Zk=@ferdeline.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div>I think you are being too diplomatic in there, Stephanie. <br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Please don't give the RT the option to reject your comments;
please insist that your two-pager objecting to Recommendation #2
be included... we cannot let this RT whitewash the situation.<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks for all that you do,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div class="protonmail_signature_block">
<div class="protonmail_signature_block-user">
<div>Ayden <br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="protonmail_signature_block-proton
protonmail_signature_block-empty"><br>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐<br>
</div>
<div> On 2 May 2018 8:47 PM, Stephanie Perrin
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca"><stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca></a> wrote:<br>
</div>
<div> <br>
</div>
<blockquote class="protonmail_quote" type="cite">
<p><span class="size" style="font-size:undefinedpx"><span
class="font" style="font-family:Lucida Grande">Attached
are my preliminary comments on the WHOIS review team 2
initial findings. This is the rollup of the subgroups
work, which we recently discussed in Brussels. I objected
strenuously to one item, that the Board had delivered on
its responsibilities re a policy. I think the EWG was a
violation of the MS process, the failure of the RDS was a
failure of ICANN as a whole (not the GNSO as Alan G
claims) and that the Board initiated interim policy is a
fundamental failure of the MS process.....</span></span><br>
</p>
<p><span class="size" style="font-size:undefinedpx"><span
class="font" style="font-family:Lucida Grande">anyway I
have asked for more time, which I doubt the Chair will
grant. Volker, who did not attend the meeting, has not
had time to go over it. He is the only contracted party
there (there are 3 GAC members) and they have to live with
all our recommendations, which I find fundamentally wrong.</span></span><br>
</p>
<p><span class="size" style="font-size:undefinedpx"><span
class="font" style="font-family:Lucida Grande">Let me know
if you have comments, I will push to get them added. They
are rushing this through when we are all GDPRing....</span></span><br>
</p>
<p><span class="size" style="font-size:undefinedpx"><span
class="font" style="font-family:Lucida Grande">cheers
Steph</span></span><br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>