[NCSG-PC] Preliminary comments on WHOIS Review 2 agreements

[Ayden Férdeline]

I think you are being too diplomatic in there, Stephanie.

Please don't give the RT the option to reject your comments; please insist that your two-pager objecting to Recommendation #2 be included... we cannot let this RT whitewash the situation.

Thanks for all that you do,

Ayden

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On 2 May 2018 8:47 PM, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:

> Attached are my preliminary comments on the WHOIS review team 2 initial findings.  This is the rollup of the subgroups work, which we recently discussed in Brussels.  I objected strenuously to one item, that the Board had delivered on its responsibilities re a policy.  I think the EWG was a violation of the MS process, the failure of the RDS was a failure of ICANN as a whole (not the GNSO as Alan G claims) and that the Board initiated interim policy is a fundamental failure of the MS process.....
>
> anyway I have asked for more time, which I doubt the Chair will grant.  Volker, who did not attend the meeting, has not had time to go over it.  He is the only contracted party there (there are 3 GAC members) and they have to live with all our recommendations, which I find fundamentally wrong.
>
> Let me know if you have comments, I will push to get them added.  They are rushing this through when we are all GDPRing....
>
> cheers Steph
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180503/f8597558/attachment.htm>