[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Updated Scope for Review

[farzaneh badii]

Stephanie

Do you mean that the SP edits were not incorporated in Keith's doc (I don't
have Keith's doc on 15 July, only 14)? and why on earth are all the IPC
questions incorporated but Darcy's clarification was not?

Stephanie, you probably need to comment on this doc on behalf of NCSG and
not just SP edits.

And this small group has two members from IPC/BC and you and Keith?

Does this final draft go to the council for discussion?





Farzaneh


On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 9:31 AM Stephanie Perrin <
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:

> I am forwarding this new version received from Keith yesterday.  Please do
> not edit the documents he sent.  I also attach my edits on his
> document...hard to keep track of this document, I found a bunch of new
> things to object to, and cannot tell anymore whether I already commented
> and was ignored, or what. It is called July 15 version, v2spedits.  Please
> get back to me asap with further comments, Keith is working on it today....
>
>
> Cheers Steph
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Updated Scope for Review
> Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2018 15:34:26 +0000
> From: Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com> <kdrazek at verisign.com>
> To: PMcGrady at winston.com <PMcGrady at winston.com> <PMcGrady at winston.com>,
> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>, susankpolicy at gmail.com
> <susankpolicy at gmail.com> <susankpolicy at gmail.com>
> CC: Donna.Austin at team.neustar <Donna.Austin at team.neustar>
> <Donna.Austin at team.neustar>, marika.konings at icann.org
> <marika.konings at icann.org> <marika.konings at icann.org>,
> caitlin.tubergen at icann.org <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>
> <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>, haforrestesq at gmail.com
> <haforrestesq at gmail.com> <haforrestesq at gmail.com>, rafik.dammak at gmail.com
> <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>
> Hi Paul, Stephanie and Susan,
>
>
>
> Attached is the updated scope document for your review. I have attached a
> redline version, a clean version, and the two sets of comments received
> from Stephanie and Darcy, both of which I’ve attempted to incorporate.
>
>
> The one comment from Darcy that I did not incorporate was a request to be
> more explicit about the timing of initiating discussions on an Access Model
> – to be at the time of publication of the Initial Report, rather than a
> less explicit trigger of answering the gating questions. You can see her
> comments in the attached.
>
>
>
> Otherwise, I think the edits are good and do not substantially or
> materially impact the previous draft. Please note any concerns, issues or
> suggested edits ASAP so we can send the final stable draft to the DT by
> Sunday night.
>
>
>
> I’m hoping this is our last pass at this!
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Keith
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180715/fa2be039/attachment.htm>