[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Updated scope section document + notes from today's EPDP scope call

[Ayden Férdeline]

This is outrageous; when Stephanie submits a redlined document, it is too difficult for ICANN staff to consider and she must start a fresh, adding the comments manually into the Google Doc that didn't exist in the first place and necessitated making the comments in Word (because Marika refused initially to enable comments on the Google Doc, despite repeated requests from Rubens, as she wanted to be the gatekeeper). Now the IPC sends in a redlined document and every single comment is added by staff into the document. My edits were all rejected by Marika last week. This is not fair, and I think we should formally complain about this. We need to start documenting staff bias.

Ayden

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On 9 July 2018 10:38 PM, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:

> I am not very happy with the "small team" efforts.  My comments are being ignored (surprise surprise) and the BC/IPC is being permitted to do back room drafting with staff, after coming in at the last minute (7 minutes to our meeting time) with new language.  I wanted that paragraph thrown out wholesale....
>
> And the questions are not all legit, and if the answers to the gating questions are not approved by the community, no matter, we go on regardless.
>
> please take a minute to think about this mess, we are being driven by artificial deadlines to finish and agree.
>
> steph
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject:	Updated scope section document + notes from today's EPDP scope call
> Date:	Mon, 9 Jul 2018 20:08:28 +0000
> From:	Caitlin Tubergen [<caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>](mailto:caitlin.tubergen at icann.org)
>
> To:	Drazek, Keith [<kdrazek at verisign.com>](mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com), Susan Kawaguchi [<susankpolicy at gmail.com>](mailto:susankpolicy at gmail.com), stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca [<stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>](mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca), Donna Austin [<donna.austin at team.neustar>](mailto:donna.austin at team.neustar), rafik.dammak at gmail.com [<rafik.dammak at gmail.com>](mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com), Heather Forrest [<haforrestesq at gmail.com>](mailto:haforrestesq at gmail.com), gnso-secs at icann.org [<gnso-secs at icann.org>](mailto:gnso-secs at icann.org), Paul McGrady (Google Docs) [<d+MTE3MzIyNzA1MjYyOTU3ODM2OTY2-MTE1MTM1NDA5ODg5NTEyMTUyMzA5 at docs.google.com>](mailto:d+MTE3MzIyNzA1MjYyOTU3ODM2OTY2-MTE1MTM1NDA5ODg5NTEyMTUyMzA5 at docs.google.com), Marika Konings [<marika.konings at icann.org>](mailto:marika.konings at icann.org)
>
> Hi Team,
>
> Following our call today, Donna and I have been working on the Google Doc from this morning’s EPDP Scope call.
>
> Here are the changes we made:
>
> - Based on the comments from Paul and others regarding the difficulty of tracking comments in Google docs to the text, I inserted proposed text into the body of the document where the commenter is proposing it should go.  All proposed text is denoted by italics and highlighted in yellow for ease of reference.  I’m hoping that will make it easier to discuss on the call by zeroing in on highlighted text.
>
> - I have removed references to phases and inserted references to gating questions. This text has been highlighted in yellow to note that it has been changed.
>
> - Proposed gating questions have their numbering highlighted in green. There may be other gating questions, but I highlighted the originally-proposed gating questions as a starting point.
>
> - Donna and I added some comments on what the group appeared to converge on during today’s call.
>
> - Lastly, I attached the notes from today’s call in case you find these helpful as you’re going through the document.
>
> Here is the link to the Google Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TlcnfYuRhrCKVB28Rvb_ra6mCIWvjUDnJyJhSjbG5_Q/edit
>
> Thank you, and please let me know if there is anything I can do to assist in your review of the document.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Caitlin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180710/f7f0564b/attachment.htm>