[NCSG-PC] Fw: Re: Sessions in Johannesburg?

Wed Apr 26 01:00:48 EEST 2017

Hi

Since I have a lot of time, I have written the NCSG meeting requests for
Tapani's consideration to submit to  Terri tomorrow. NCUC will participate
in all of the NCSG meetings but we might have a couple of informal meetings
separate from NCSG, I will ask for nonconflicting meetings.

Note that I have asked for all the meetings to be public and in the email
to Terri we should be clear that we want meetings for all 4 days and they
are not just for one day.

Best

Farzaneh

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Shears <matthew at intpolicy.com>
wrote:

> + 1
>
> On 25/04/2017 21:35, farzaneh badii wrote:
>
> Martin,  I think these can be  NCSG meetings which include both NCUC and
> NPOC. we should say in the description of the meeting that NCSG, as well as
> its constituencies, will hold these meetings but strictly talk about policy
> and what at the NCSG level we are working on. Based on each day GNSO
> program I think we could brief the attendees on the issues and our
> strategies to tackle the issue and also brief them on how we come up with
> policies.
>
> Farzaneh
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Martin Pablo Silva Valent <
> mpsilvavalent at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Maybe NPOC can pitch in the outreach session as well, Poncelet can maybe
>> bring that idea back if we decide to merge NCSG session with NCUC, after
>> all they share some common audience.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> On Apr 25, 2017, at 4:11 PM, Matthew Shears <matthew at intpolicy.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I support this approach - thanks!
>>
>> On 25/04/2017 21:04, farzaneh badii wrote:
>>
>> Hi Kathy, all,
>>
>> Actually  it might make more sense to have NCSG meetings and not have
>> separate NCUC meetings. Because from the schedule I see, we cannot possibly
>> have meetings that do not conflict.
>>
>> I think Tapani wanted the slots for Outreach policy practice in the
>> morning. which starts at 8.00 AM. If we can have 1 hour of those every day
>> and prepare people for the rest of the day that would be good. We might
>> have to just do 30 minutes lunch breaks (as instructed by the planning
>> team) to either strategize for the afternoon or meet with other groups.
>>
>> I talked to EC members and they don't mind merging with NCSG. I might
>> reserve a 30 minutes lunch break for an informal meeting with some of the
>> board memebers but other than that I think we will be ok if NCSG can submit
>> :
>>
>> One hour morning sessions (outreach and policy strategy)
>>
>> 30 minutes during lunch breaks
>>
>> If Tapani and the rest agree with that I will not ask for separate time
>> slots for NCUC.
>>
>>
>> Farzaneh
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Observer too to Farzi's important suggestion -- with follow-up.
>>>
>>> Quick thought that we might want to have a longer NCUC/NCSG prep meeting
>>> (for all NCSG attendees) early on in the meeting. It would be good to have
>>> an arc of all the issues in Jo'burg we should be thinking about -- and give
>>> people some time to think, research and read for a day before jumping into
>>> a WG discussion.
>>>
>>> - So 30 minute AM meetings for the daily briefing
>>>
>>> - Occasional lunch sessions, including one with Board members
>>>
>>> - An initial hour meeting at the very start (Monday AM?) to provide an
>>> arc of the issues we need to work on together in this meeting.
>>>
>>> Best, Kathy
>>>
>>> On 4/25/2017 2:19 PM, farzaneh badii wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello PC
>>>
>>> Observer here: for NCUC, not to make a very busy schedule
>>> unnecessarily busier, I will send requests for 30 minutes morning sessions
>>> and 45 minutes lunch break sessions. Since I will not be there I would like
>>> some of the NCUC members on NCSG PC members to lead the discussions and
>>> prepare our members for each day. We might also arrange a 45 minutes board
>>> meeting for NCUC during a lunch break.Please keep this in mind before
>>> submitting your requests, we don't want to have schedule conflicts with
>>> NCSG. If you want to also have similar half an hour morning sessions on
>>> policy strategy and outreach, let me know perhaps just joining NCSG meeting
>>> in the morning is wiser.
>>>
>>> Farzaneh
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Tapani Tarvainen <
>>> ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm fine with an extra PC session - at least we can ask.
>>>>
>>>> Could somebody come up with a title and description for it?
>>>>
>>>> Deadline is tomorrow, and I'll be traveling most of the day,
>>>> like today (now in train) - I'll finalize this tomorrow evening.
>>>>
>>>> Tapani
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 25 17:59, Rafik Dammak (rafik.dammak at gmail.com) wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Hi Ayden,
>>>> >
>>>> > yes, we can do that. It is at the end a policy forum so discussing the
>>>> > scheduled topics and sessions, and planning response to public
>>>> comments and
>>>> > positions makes sense.
>>>> > I assume that should be on the last day so can we have it as kind of
>>>> > wrap-up session.
>>>> > Best,
>>>> >
>>>> > Rafik
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > 2017-04-25 17:21 GMT+09:00 Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Resending this, as the PC list dropped off inadvertently.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > - Ayden
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > -------- Original Message --------
>>>> > > Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Sessions in Johannesburg?
>>>> > > Local Time: 25 April 2017 9:20 AM
>>>> > > UTC Time: 25 April 2017 08:20
>>>> > > From: icann at ferdeline.com
>>>> > > To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Hi,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > While I am open to meeting with other groups if time permits, I am
>>>> > > wondering if it might be more useful having two PC meetings --- one
>>>> of
>>>> > > which could be solely for discussing upcoming public comments,
>>>> allocating
>>>> > > them, and formulating our positions?
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Best wishes,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Ayden
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>
>>>
>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> Virus-free.
>> www.avg.com
>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>> --
>> Matthew Shearsmatthew at intpolicy.com+447712472987 <+44%207712%20472987>Skype:mshears
>>
>> _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>> --
> Matthew Shearsmatthew at intpolicy.com+447712472987 <+44%207712%20472987>Skype:mshears
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170425/eaec4b8e/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: NCSG-Lunchbreak meetings.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 15370 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170425/eaec4b8e/attachment.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: NCSG-Session requests.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 15437 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170425/eaec4b8e/attachment-0001.docx>