[NCSG-PC] Fw: Re: Sessions in Johannesburg?
Matthew Shears
matthew at intpolicy.com
Tue Apr 25 22:38:12 EEST 2017
+ 1
On 25/04/2017 21:35, farzaneh badii wrote:
> Martin, I think these can be NCSG meetings which include both NCUC
> and NPOC. we should say in the description of the meeting that NCSG,
> as well as its constituencies, will hold these meetings but strictly
> talk about policy and what at the NCSG level we are working on. Based
> on each day GNSO program I think we could brief the attendees on the
> issues and our strategies to tackle the issue and also brief them on
> how we come up with policies.
>
> Farzaneh
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Martin Pablo Silva Valent
> <mpsilvavalent at gmail.com <mailto:mpsilvavalent at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Maybe NPOC can pitch in the outreach session as well, Poncelet can
> maybe bring that idea back if we decide to merge NCSG session with
> NCUC, after all they share some common audience.
>
> Martin
>
>> On Apr 25, 2017, at 4:11 PM, Matthew Shears
>> <matthew at intpolicy.com <mailto:matthew at intpolicy.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I support this approach - thanks!
>>
>>
>> On 25/04/2017 21:04, farzaneh badii wrote:
>>> Hi Kathy, all,
>>>
>>> Actually it might make more sense to have NCSG meetings and not
>>> have separate NCUC meetings. Because from the schedule I see, we
>>> cannot possibly have meetings that do not conflict.
>>>
>>> I think Tapani wanted the slots for Outreach policy practice in
>>> the morning. which starts at 8.00 AM. If we can have 1 hour of
>>> those every day and prepare people for the rest of the day that
>>> would be good. We might have to just do 30 minutes lunch breaks
>>> (as instructed by the planning team) to either strategize for
>>> the afternoon or meet with other groups.
>>>
>>> I talked to EC members and they don't mind merging with NCSG. I
>>> might reserve a 30 minutes lunch break for an informal meeting
>>> with some of the board memebers but other than that I think we
>>> will be ok if NCSG can submit :
>>>
>>> One hour morning sessions (outreach and policy strategy)
>>>
>>> 30 minutes during lunch breaks
>>>
>>> If Tapani and the rest agree with that I will not ask for
>>> separate time slots for NCUC.
>>>
>>> Farzaneh
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Kathy Kleiman
>>> <kathy at kathykleiman.com <mailto:kathy at kathykleiman.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Observer too to Farzi's important suggestion -- with follow-up.
>>>
>>> Quick thought that we might want to have a longer NCUC/NCSG
>>> prep meeting (for all NCSG attendees) early on in the
>>> meeting. It would be good to have an arc of all the issues
>>> in Jo'burg we should be thinking about -- and give people
>>> some time to think, research and read for a day before
>>> jumping into a WG discussion.
>>>
>>> - So 30 minute AM meetings for the daily briefing
>>>
>>> - Occasional lunch sessions, including one with Board members
>>>
>>> - An initial hour meeting at the very start (Monday AM?) to
>>> provide an arc of the issues we need to work on together in
>>> this meeting.
>>>
>>> Best, Kathy
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/25/2017 2:19 PM, farzaneh badii wrote:
>>>> Hello PC
>>>>
>>>> Observer here: for NCUC, not to make a very busy schedule
>>>> unnecessarily busier, I will send requests for 30 minutes
>>>> morning sessions and 45 minutes lunch break sessions. Since
>>>> I will not be there I would like some of the NCUC members
>>>> on NCSG PC members to lead the discussions and prepare our
>>>> members for each day. We might also arrange a 45 minutes
>>>> board meeting for NCUC during a lunch break.Please keep
>>>> this in mind before submitting your requests, we don't want
>>>> to have schedule conflicts with NCSG. If you want to also
>>>> have similar half an hour morning sessions on policy
>>>> strategy and outreach, let me know perhaps just joining
>>>> NCSG meeting in the morning is wiser.
>>>>
>>>> Farzaneh
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Tapani Tarvainen
>>>> <ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info
>>>> <mailto:ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm fine with an extra PC session - at least we can ask.
>>>>
>>>> Could somebody come up with a title and description for it?
>>>>
>>>> Deadline is tomorrow, and I'll be traveling most of the
>>>> day,
>>>> like today (now in train) - I'll finalize this tomorrow
>>>> evening.
>>>>
>>>> Tapani
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 25 17:59, Rafik Dammak (rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>) wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Hi Ayden,
>>>> >
>>>> > yes, we can do that. It is at the end a policy forum
>>>> so discussing the
>>>> > scheduled topics and sessions, and planning response
>>>> to public comments and
>>>> > positions makes sense.
>>>> > I assume that should be on the last day so can we
>>>> have it as kind of
>>>> > wrap-up session.
>>>> > Best,
>>>> >
>>>> > Rafik
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > 2017-04-25 17:21 GMT+09:00 Ayden Férdeline
>>>> <icann at ferdeline.com <mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>>:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Resending this, as the PC list dropped off
>>>> inadvertently.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > - Ayden
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > -------- Original Message --------
>>>> > > Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Sessions in Johannesburg?
>>>> > > Local Time: 25 April 2017 9:20 AM
>>>> > > UTC Time: 25 April 2017 08:20
>>>> > > From: icann at ferdeline.com <mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>
>>>> > > To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Hi,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > While I am open to meeting with other groups if
>>>> time permits, I am
>>>> > > wondering if it might be more useful having two PC
>>>> meetings --- one of
>>>> > > which could be solely for discussing upcoming
>>>> public comments, allocating
>>>> > > them, and formulating our positions?
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Best wishes,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Ayden
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>> <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>> <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
>>>
>>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>>> Virus-free. www.avg.com
>>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>> <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
>> --
>> Matthew Shears
>> matthew at intpolicy.com <mailto:matthew at intpolicy.com>
>> +447712472987 <tel:+44%207712%20472987>
>> Skype:mshears
>> _______________________________________________ NCSG-PC mailing
>> list NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>> <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
>
--
Matthew Shears
matthew at intpolicy.com
+447712472987
Skype:mshears
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170425/8d7bfe50/attachment.htm>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list