Suggested amendments to ICANN's bylaws and NomCom

[Raoul Plommer]

I did voice my concerns when the review team was asking for input on
recommendation 10, we submitted our reasoning for getting another seat and
yeah, might've missed that one crucial meeting with GNSO but I certainly
thought our councillors knew our stance too and I think it would be quite
weird if they didn't echo out concerns we've been very vocal about for the
last .. ten years?

The biggest reason for recommendation 10 was the imbalance between NCSG and
CSG and everyone knows our stance very well. Using a pretext of not being
in one particular meeting over the course of five years of the RIWG and
thus ignoring our concerns over the last ten years is pathetic in my
opinion.

-Raoul

On Mon, 29 May 2023, 04:37 Johan Helsingius, <julf at julf.com> wrote:

> Hi Raoul,
>
> One pushback I keep hearing is "You had your representatives in the
> review and review implementation teams. You didn't speak up then."
>
>         Julf
>
>
> On 24/04/2023 21:19, Raoul Plommer wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > It looks like the proposed amendment to ICANN's bylaws is going to take
> > out the specific composition of the seven NomCom delegates and shift the
> > decision on the number of representatives to the GNSO.
> >
> >
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf
> <
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf>
> see pg. 4.
> >
> > The public comment is here:
> >
> https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023
> <
> https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023
> >
> >
> > It might be a good time to approach the CPH once again about this and
> > agree to lessen the CSG's representation in the NCSG's favor? :-)
> >
> > The public comment period closes on the 29th of May.
> >
> > -Raoul
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-discuss/attachments/20230529/b7719124/attachment.htm>