Suggested amendments to ICANN's bylaws and NomCom
Johan Helsingius
julf at JULF.COM
Mon May 29 05:33:50 EEST 2023
Hi Raoul,
One pushback I keep hearing is "You had your representatives in the
review and review implementation teams. You didn't speak up then."
Julf
On 24/04/2023 21:19, Raoul Plommer wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> It looks like the proposed amendment to ICANN's bylaws is going to take
> out the specific composition of the seven NomCom delegates and shift the
> decision on the number of representatives to the GNSO.
>
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf> see pg. 4.
>
> The public comment is here:
> https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023 <https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023>
>
> It might be a good time to approach the CPH once again about this and
> agree to lessen the CSG's representation in the NCSG's favor? :-)
>
> The public comment period closes on the 29th of May.
>
> -Raoul
More information about the Ncsg-discuss
mailing list