Suggested amendments to ICANN's bylaws and NomCom

[Johan Helsingius]

Seems we missed more than one meeting. How many meetings were there in
total, and how many did we miss?

	Julf

On 29/05/2023 16:17, Raoul Plommer wrote:
> I did voice my concerns when the review team was asking for input on 
> recommendation 10, we submitted our reasoning for getting another seat 
> and yeah, might've missed that one crucial meeting with GNSO but I 
> certainly thought our councillors knew our stance too and I think it 
> would be quite weird if they didn't echo out concerns we've been very 
> vocal about for the last .. ten years?
> 
> The biggest reason for recommendation 10 was the imbalance between NCSG 
> and CSG and everyone knows our stance very well. Using a pretext of not 
> being in one particular meeting over the course of five years of the 
> RIWG and thus ignoring our concerns over the last ten years is pathetic 
> in my opinion.
> 
> -Raoul
> 
> On Mon, 29 May 2023, 04:37 Johan Helsingius, <julf at julf.com 
> <mailto:julf at julf.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi Raoul,
> 
>     One pushback I keep hearing is "You had your representatives in the
>     review and review implementation teams. You didn't speak up then."
> 
>              Julf
> 
> 
>     On 24/04/2023 21:19, Raoul Plommer wrote:
>      > Hi everyone,
>      >
>      > It looks like the proposed amendment to ICANN's bylaws is going
>     to take
>      > out the specific composition of the seven NomCom delegates and
>     shift the
>      > decision on the number of representatives to the GNSO.
>      >
>      >
>     https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf>> see pg. 4.
>      >
>      > The public comment is here:
>      >
>     https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023 <https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023> <https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023 <https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023>>
>      >
>      > It might be a good time to approach the CPH once again about this
>     and
>      > agree to lessen the CSG's representation in the NCSG's favor? :-)
>      >
>      > The public comment period closes on the 29th of May.
>      >
>      > -Raoul
>