<div dir="auto">I did voice my concerns when the review team was asking for input on recommendation 10, we submitted our reasoning for getting another seat and yeah, might've missed that one crucial meeting with GNSO but I certainly thought our councillors knew our stance too and I think it would be quite weird if they didn't echo out concerns we've been very vocal about for the last .. ten years?<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">The biggest reason for recommendation 10 was the imbalance between NCSG and CSG and everyone knows our stance very well. Using a pretext of not being in one particular meeting over the course of five years of the RIWG and thus ignoring our concerns over the last ten years is pathetic in my opinion.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">-Raoul</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, 29 May 2023, 04:37 Johan Helsingius, <<a href="mailto:julf@julf.com">julf@julf.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Raoul,<br>
<br>
One pushback I keep hearing is "You had your representatives in the<br>
review and review implementation teams. You didn't speak up then."<br>
<br>
        Julf<br>
<br>
<br>
On 24/04/2023 21:19, Raoul Plommer wrote:<br>
> Hi everyone,<br>
> <br>
> It looks like the proposed amendment to ICANN's bylaws is going to take <br>
> out the specific composition of the seven NomCom delegates and shift the <br>
> decision on the number of representatives to the GNSO.<br>
> <br>
> <a href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf</a> <<a href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/proposed-bylaws-amendments-10apr23-en.pdf</a>> see pg. 4.<br>
> <br>
> The public comment is here: <br>
> <a href="https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023</a> <<a href="https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/bylaws-amendments-and-documents-to-implement-the-nomcom2-review-17-04-2023</a>><br>
> <br>
> It might be a good time to approach the CPH once again about this and <br>
> agree to lessen the CSG's representation in the NCSG's favor? :-)<br>
> <br>
> The public comment period closes on the 29th of May.<br>
> <br>
> -Raoul<br>
</blockquote></div>