[NCSG-PC] Input requested: Review of Reviews

Rafik Dammak rafik.dammak at gmail.com
Thu Sep 24 14:07:55 EEST 2026


Hi all,

Here some update from cross-community group for review of reviews to our
previous question. We got now a new question about the cadence of reviews.
Please share your input, as we should respond by 29th September.

Best,

Rafik

---------- Forwarded message ---------


Hi GNSO Leaders,

Thank you all for your help in providing feedback to the RoR CCG on
representation. I can confirm that the CCG will recommend up to 3
representatives from each SO/AC for Accountability and Transparency Review
(ATR) and On Demand Review Teams. I am also sharing the summary of changes
made by the CCG in response to public comment
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LnZBtPI8QtF0ErgGNUwStLZb4eiEJCyfREh42gGQ_RU/edit?tab=t.0

Osvaldo and I have been given further homework, to reach out to the GNSO
and understand their positions on Structural Review cadence and whether an
ATR or Structural Review should go first. Currently, the CCG is proposing a
15-year cadence for the Structural Review, and the first review to be the
ATR. Osvaldo has shared the attached statement with the CCG proposing a
6-year cadence and the Structural Review to go first.

Could you please ask your groups whether they agree with Osvaldo's proposal
or not and let us know ahead of the next CCG call (Tuesday 29 September,
2100 UTC). As with the last request, I will share this to SG mailing lists
I have access to, but I ask that you get input from your groups. Apologies
for the tight turnaround, I know that everyone is busy.

Thanks,
Sophie

Sophie Hey
 she/her
 Senior Policy Advisor
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20260924/994e6bca/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: submittalonCandenceON.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 44623 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20260924/994e6bca/attachment-0001.pdf>


More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list