[NCSG-PC] Nomcom comments

[Tomslin Samme-Nlar]

Thanks, Julf. I am happy with it.

Warmly,
Tomslin



On Tue, 11 Jun 2024 at 16:51, Johan Helsingius via NCSG-PC <
ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is> wrote:

> Benjamnin and Juan,
>
> Are you OK with the response being a joint NCSG/NCUC/NPOC one?
>
>         Julf
>
>
> On 11/06/2024 15:50, Johan Helsingius via NCSG-PC wrote:
> > Here is my suggested response to Greg's question about the NomCom
> > changes.
> >
> > Google doc at:
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z2EIBHxO68xOklCFqw44Df8f225QCR94eDobzlXZ9CI/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> >
> > The question is "Do you believe there would be any objections from your
> > groups, and potentially delegates that you have already identified, to
> > proceeding with a simple path forward in which we randomly select three
> > of seven GNSO delegates to serve one-year terms?"
> >
> > We do find that the recommendations and internally inconsistent and
> > should not have been approved. On one hand the recommendations
> > call for staggered terms in order to provide continuity and to
> > avoid an "all new faces" situation, but then on the other hand
> > force all representatives to be new appointees (with reappointing
> > existing representatives specifically not allowed) at the beginning
> > of the new term structure.
> >
> > We also note that the random selection of lengths of initial
> > terms might be appropriate for an AC like ALAC as they don't
> > have multiple constituencies with diverging interests and
> > uneven representation. We don't think it is appropriate
> > for the GNSO.
> >
> > In addition to the issue about initial terms, we also want
> > to once again note another reason the recommendations should
> > not have been approved. In the draft recommendations there
> > was almost to the end a recommendation for a NomCom rebalancing.
> > It is our understanding that that recommendation was removed
> > at the last moment, based on a vote taken at one single meeting
> > where none of our constituencies were represented. We don't
> > feel that is how consensus policy should be decided.
> >
> > On behalf of the NCSG, NCUC and NPOC,
> >
> >      Julf Helsingius, NCSG Chair
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NCSG-PC mailing list
> > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20240612/c77ba769/attachment-0001.htm>