[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Article on Small Team Proposal to the GNSO Council

[Stephanie E Perrin]

Here is Palage's missive.  I go bonkers when I see these unsigned, 
untitled, undated documents circulating.....having tried to do a 
dissertation by going through all the documentation on 20 years of 
arguments, let me assure you this is not the first time a badly 
attributed documented roamed into our GNSO corral.

cheers SP.

PS don't be surprised if tomorrow's meeting goes longer than it should......




-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Article on Small Team Proposal to the GNSO Council
Date: 	Wed, 13 Apr 2022 12:36:26 -0400
From: 	Michael Palage <michael at palage.com>
Reply-To: 	michael at palage.com
To: 	'Alan Greenberg' <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>, 'Stephanie E Perrin' 
<stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>, john.mcelwaine at nelsonmullins.com, 
pmcgrady at taftlaw.com, Sebastien at registry.godaddy, 'Kapin, Laureen' 
<LKAPIN at ftc.gov>, 'Olga Cavalli' <olgacavalli at gmail.com>, 'Thomas 
Rickert | rickert.law' <thomas at rickert.law>, 'Sarah Wyld' 
<swyld at tucows.com>, 'Steve DelBianco' <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>, 'Becky 
Burr' <becky.burr at board.icann.org>, 'Steve Crocker' <steve at shinkuro.com>
CC: 	'Marika Konings' <marika.konings at icann.org>



Hello All,

Attached is a document which comments on the proposed Small Team 
recommendations to the GNSO Council.

Over the last week we have presented our reference implementation of an 
SSAD Sandbox to the BC and IPC.  In fact, both Steve and Paul 
participated in those sessions.  We believe this reference 
implementation addresses ALL of the original EPDP Phase 2 
recommendations as adopted by the GNSO Council.  It would really be nice 
if the Small Team and ICANN Org could make fact based policy decisions 
on what is technically and cost efficiently possible before prematurely 
scaling back EPDP Phase 2 recommendations based upon flawed financial 
assumptions.

To be clear we are just asking the Small Team or ICANN Org to invite ALL 
interested parties to show what is possible, before 
suspending/disregarding a Super Majority vote of the GNSO Council on the 
EPDP Phase 2 recommendations.

Best regards,

Michael
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20220413/729791c7/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GNSO-Communication-12-April-2022.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 42265 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20220413/729791c7/attachment.docx>