[NCSG-PC] [urgent for review] Proposed Comment on the Geographic Names at the Top Level - Supplemental Initial Report

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Farell,

thanks for the feedback.
I don't think the format can be an issue, the policy staff has still to go
through the submitted document and  link each comment to recommendation,
question or part of the report. I believe that the document explicitly
indicates which recommendation or question we are commenting which make
things easier for staff for compilation and WG members for review.
EPDP is a particular case as the public comment was through a google form.
Some WGs can ask to follow a different format for submission e.g.
questionnaire.

Best,

Rafik

Le jeu. 31 janv. 2019 à 17:20, Farell FOLLY <farell at benin2point0.org> a
écrit :

> That is a very good comment. Apart from some minor typos, I have no
> additional input. I thank the drafters, they did a very good job.
>
> However; the format is rather different from recent comments we wrote, and
> for coherence I suggest that in the future we always try to stick to a
> similar template (paragraphs, numbering style, etc.), otherwise our
> targets/intended recipients could get confused about our style (i.e to
> easily identify where we analyse, where we conclude and where we opine,
> etc.) when they receive two or more consecutive feedbacks from us.
> Nevertheless, the document is good and well written.
>
> @Rafik, I recall that a DIFFERENT feedback submission format has been
> recently used for EPDP, and here; we had also agreed on a kind of template
> (style, paragraphs, information, fields) to include in our NCSG comments,
> consequently; do you think that we can merge both and suggest that to ICANN
> as PC submission template? Or simply adapt it for our own use (and of
> course, formalize it through our operations procedures)
>
> @__f_f__
>
> Best Regards
> ____________________________________
>
> (Ekue) Farell FOLLY
> NCUC Rep. to the NCSG Policy Committee
> linkedin.com/in/farellf
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 31 Jan 2019, at 06:52, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at GMAIL.COM> wrote:
>
> Thanks Tatiana and Ayden, looking for other PC members to review.
>
> Rafik
>
> Le jeu. 31 janv. 2019 à 08:26, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com>
> a écrit :
>
>> My support for submission and my thanks to Bruna and everyone who drafted
>> it, too.
>> Cheers,
>> Tanya
>>
>> On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 00:17, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I support the submission of this comment; thanks to Bruna et al for
>>> drafting it!
>>>
>>> Ayden
>>>
>>>
>>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>>> On Tuesday, January 29, 2019 6:48 AM, Rafik Dammak <
>>> rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> we have this draft comment to review quickly , regarding WT5 initial
>>> report.
>>> it is a critical track in subpro WG.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>> From: *Bruna Martins dos Santos* <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>
>>> Date: mar. 29 janv. 2019 à 20:35
>>> Subject: [NCSG-Discuss] Proposed Comment on the Geographic Names at the
>>> Top Level - Supplemental Initial Report
>>> To: <NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I would like to share with you the proposed comment to the *Work Track
>>> 5 on Geographic Names at the Top Level - Supplemental Initial Report of the
>>> New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process. *Submissions
>>> are due in just over three days time (feb 1st as a deadline), so I’m
>>> sharing this on our mailing list today for your speedy review and suggested
>>> edits.
>>>
>>> The proposed comment can be found here:
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EyQ_D37jbIpKByOyknOVwrBO0-GLKVdyFI_64_s2l9U/edit
>>>
>>> Ps. Thanks to Farzaneh and all the others who volunteered to work on
>>> this comment.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> --
>>> *Bruna Martins dos Santos *
>>>
>>> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
>>> @boomartins
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20190131/f6a8c19c/attachment.htm>