[NCSG-PC] Fwd: FW: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN64 - Board topic for Discussion & Questions to the Board

Sun Feb 24 18:26:09 EET 2019

Hi Stephanie,

Thank you for drafting these, with no help and sorry if you felt alone in
this, I will try and pay more attention.

I am struggling with topic two and topic three and solution number 1. I
think any question related to EPDP has to be addressed in a way that is
within the Board's remit not the remit of GNSO. Questions about chair etc
is related to GNSO. I think we can discuss the budget for EPDP more broadly
and perhaps ask the CEO what he is gonna do when the technical team they
have assembled will step in policy area.

As to topic number 3, I don't think Board and CEO will have a good solution
for that. The thing they should not be doing is not to get involved but
help us. We have to admit that DNS is a limited Internet governance issue
that not many want to get involved in and invest in our members who are
interested to get involved.

Solution number 1 about travel funding is also not very convincing and I
don't think we should bring it up.

I'd like us to ask the board a couple of questions regarding their emphasis
on receiving community feedback on every aspect of their work and then it
is not very clear what they do with these comments and feedback. Do they
ask for feedback to later on justify their decision? If yes, how do they
include everyone's feedback? If no, what is the point of asking for
feedback? I also  want to know why in the middle of EPDP deliberations
board sent a letter to GNSO council asking what our plan B was? I believe
and this is my personal opinion, a not very subtle nudge to EPDP volunteers
and GNSO council to get their job done was not in the multistakeholder
spirit and might be unprecedented. Also not a bad idea to discuss their
plans for UAM. Was the technical group the only step? Are they envisioning
taking other actions before phase 2 is finalized?

It also seems like the governments are getting more and more traction and
more important than other stakeholder groups. I get that impression from
the CEO and Board reps speeches in various venues. And they are not making
the speeches only to the government but they are making it in
multistakeholder environment. I don't want this to come across as an
accusation but it might be very much related to your good answer to
question 2 of the board about coopeartion.

Best

Farzaneh

On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 10:55 AM Stephanie Perrin <
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:

> Thanks so much Kathy, here is a new version...and re the harassment issue,
> I was just wanting to say good job, and get Bruna or Elsa to introduce that
> topic.  Quick and positive, not much need to discuss.
>
> Cheers SP
> On 2019-02-24 10:39, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
>
> Stephanie,
>
> Tx for the thought and care! Can we move the public interest up earlier,
> and make it broader? This is the NCSG meeting with the Board on the Tuesday
> in Kobe, right?  I think finding out more broadly about the Board's project
> on exploring or defining the public interest is important. What is
> happening?  All I get are hints.  This is something that we, NCSG, should
> be front and center in!   What is it?  Who's leading it? What's the
> timeframe?  What are the community input points, etc. T
>
> Then drilling down more to a second subtopic on the theme as you have laid
> out --*Security, Privacy and the Public Interest*
>
> I would move "Public Interest" up to #2 to make sure it is reached and
> covered. I think it is the topic for which the most new information may be
> generated and shared.
>
> Bruna, Elsa and I can fill NCSG on Sexual Harassment at the NCSG meeting,
> and it won't take long. There is a new Board committee, Sarah Deutsch is
> the chair, and there are numerous Board members on it. There will be a
> meeting on Monday morning for the group of people who have been encouraging
> (really pushing) the Board to move forward -- Bruna and Elsa were real
> leaders here. Not much more to report -- and I don't there will be much
> more on Tuesday in Kobe... But perhaps a statement from you to the Board
> that the NCSG supports forward movement in this area?
>
> Best, Kathy
>
> On 2/24/2019 10:26 AM, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
>
> just a gentle jog...we are a week late on this.  I am stuck on the three
> Answers to our planning challenges...here is the draft so far, comments
> welcome
>
> cheers Steph
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: FW: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN64 - Board topic for Discussion &
> Questions to the Board
> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:03:28 +0000
> From: Maryam Bakoshi <maryam.bakoshi at icann.org> <maryam.bakoshi at icann.org>
> To: Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Many thanks,
>
>
>
> *Maryam Bakoshi* | SO/AC Collaboration Services Sr. Coordinator
>
> *ICANN* | Internet Corporation got Assigned Names and Numbers
>
> *S*: Maryam.bakoshi.icann | *T*: +44 7846 471777
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Maryam Bakoshi <maryam.bakoshi at icann.org>
> <maryam.bakoshi at icann.org>
> *Date: *Monday, 11 February 2019 at 08:47
> *To: *"stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca"
> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
> *Subject: *Fwd: [So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN64 - Board topic for Discussion
> & Questions to the Board
>
>
>
>
> Dear Stephanie,
>
>
>
> Please see below deadline for Board questions which is the 18th of
> February.
>
> —
>
> Many thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
> *Maryam Bakoshi* | SO/AC Collaboration Services Sr. Coordinator
>
> *ICANN* | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
>
> *S*: Maryam.bakoshi.icann | *T*: +44 7846 471777
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From:* Vinciane Koenigsfeld <vinciane.koenigsfeld at icann.org>
> *Date:* 11 February 2019 at 08:13:02 GMT
> *To:* "so-ac-sg-cleaders at icann.org" <so-ac-sg-cleaders at icann.org>
> *Cc:* Board Ops Team <board-ops-team at icann.org>
> *Subject:* *[So-ac-sg-cleaders] ICANN64 - Board topic for Discussion &
> Questions to the Board*
>
> *Gentle reminder – deadline for Questions to the Board – Monday 18
> February*
>
>
>
> *From: *Vinciane Koenigsfeld <vinciane.koenigsfeld at icann.org>
> *Date: *Friday 18 January 2019 at 18:27
> *To: *"so-ac-sg-cleaders at icann.org" <so-ac-sg-cleaders at icann.org>
> *Cc: *David Olive <david.olive at icann.org>, Board Ops Team <
> board-ops-team at icann.org>
> *Subject: *ICANN64 - Board topic for Discussion & Questions to the Board
>
>
>
> Dear Constituency and Stakeholder Groups Chairs,
>
>
>
> *Questions from your Groups to the Board - Please reply no later than
> Monday 18 February 2019*
>
>
>
> On behalf of the Board, I would like to wish each and every one of you, a
> HAPPY NEW YEAR!
>
>
>
> In 2019, the Board and I are determined to work with you more closely than
> ever to make it a productive and successful year for ICANN’s future.
>
>
>
> We are very much looking forward to welcoming you and discussing with you
> during ICANN64 which will take place in Kobe between 9-14 March 2019.
>
>
>
> This time in particular, the Board would like to listen to your
> suggestions in order to make ICANN’s big plans successful.
>
>
>
> *What does it mean*?
>
>
>
> In 2018, besides GDPR, the Community, the Board and ICANN org have worked
> tirelessly on several key plans that are now or soon will be out for public
> comment:
>
>
>
> - the draft Strategic Plan 2021-2025 was published a little before
> Christmas;
>
> -  the first consultation paper on a 2-Year budgeting process was also
> published before Christmas;
>
> -  and the draft FY21-25 Operating Plan & Financial Projections will be
> posted before this summer.
>
>
>
> In addition, based on community feedback and discussions at ICANN 63, we
> will begin a consultation in Kobe on the status of ICANN’s
> governance’s model, including whether and how it should evolve to continue
> to serve the global ICANN community.
>
>
>
> In the aggregate, these plans are comprehensive and address the key
> challenges ICANN’s faces in the future in the areas of security;
> governance; unique identifier systems; geopolitics; and financials.
>
>
>
> Even great plans come with challenges, which we want to anticipate and
> address as a prelude to implementation.  We pulled together once before,
> galvanized our resources effectively and achieved a successful transition.
> We need to do it again to address ICANN’s future challenges. Are we ready?
> Do we, for example, collectively have the leadership, skills, resources,
> knowledge and commitment required to implement these plans successfully
> over the next five years? We need your help for this.
>
>
>
> Specifically, as you prepare for Kobe, we would like your high-level input
> on:
>
>
>
>    1. What the Board, ICANN org, and the Community should be doing now to
>    prepare for the successful implementation of these plans?  Please make *three
>    suggestions* as concrete as possible, providing one each for the
>    Board, ICANN org, and the Community.
>
>
>
>    1. While the success of these plans lies primarily within ICANN, we
>    all know that ICANN does not operate in a vacuum, and alliances
>    and partnerships are important to our success.  How can we increase the
>    likelihood that important allies and partners in the space are on the same
>    page and working together to achieve common/agreed upon goals?  Please
>    provide *one suggestion* of something that could be done externally to
>    improve trust and collaboration.
>
>
>
> We are looking forward to hearing *your four suggestions* during our
> face-to-face meetings in Kobe so that we could then work jointly towards a
> successful implementation of ICANN’s future plans, that you have been
> involved in formulating.
>
>
>
> In the meantime, we would be very grateful if you could send to Board
> Operations (board-ops-team at icann.org)  the questions you would like the
> Board to address during our face-to-face meetings.  Given the finite time
> available for these meetings, we would appreciate it very much if you could
> list your questions in order of priority.   We would also appreciate
> getting your questions no later than *Monday 18 February, 2019 or sooner*.
>
>
>
> We thank you in advance for your time on this matter and we look forward
> to welcoming you in Japan!
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Cherine Chalaby
>
> Chair, ICANN Board of Directors
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> so-ac-sg-cleaders at icann.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> So-ac-sg-cleaders mailing list
> So-ac-sg-cleaders at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/so-ac-sg-cleaders
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
>
>
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon> Virus-free.
> www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link>
> <#m_6860862337002560575_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20190224/98913a50/attachment.htm>