[NCSG-PC] Fwd: High Interest Topics for ICANN64 — Need Your Input

[Arsène Tungali]

I think that’s a valid point, Elsa. 

And it makes sence to try that methodology at icann64 if we are able to influence the team organizing the upcoming HIT sessions.

Sent from my iPhone

> On 15 Nov 2018, at 04:46, Elsa S <elsa.saade at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hey Steph,
> 
> No tangible thoughts yet, but I think the main problem might be that HIT sessions have had a precedent of “reopening questions that had been answered and dealt with” when it comes to community Q&A and that they could be (for the lack of a better term) a loss of time for presenters who could be doing policy work instead of a HIT session, especially when it came to EPDP in the last session for instance. 
> 
> Maybe a more interesting way to do HIT sessions would be multiple High Interest Topic Summaries in the same amount of time that one HIT session normally takes? Maybe I’m just being too optimistic here but it would kind of be a reporting time for the community from the WGs and more of a motivator for individuals or SGs/Cs to get engaged in the WG, or keep an eye out on Public Comments concerning those topics, or at least signing up to mailing lists and engaging if they find something problematic.
> 
> This might not make much sense, but that’s what I could think of at the top of my burntout head!
> 
> Best,
> 
> E.
> —
> 
>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 9:28 PM Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>> Good idea Elsa....do we have tangible thoughts for improvement?
>> 
>> SP
>> 
>>> On 2018-11-14 20:54, Elsa S wrote:
>>> Just a side note that in the last GNSO council meeting in Barcelona, there was a discussion about HIT sessions not being as efficient as they should be! So maybe if we have a chance to comment we could suggest a change in structure of that kind of session so that we would be consistent with our comments in the council?
>>> 
>>> E.
>>> —
>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:35 AM Stephanie Perrin <stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca> wrote:
>>>> There is a lot to talk about though Fik.....on UAM.
>>>> 
>>>>> On 2018-11-13 11:07, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> By Kobe meeting, EPDP should be ready to start access discussion . We shouldn't have a separate session on UAM per se as it will overlap.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best, 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Rafik 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018, 00:53 Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca wrote:
>>>>>> we need a decision on this asap folks.  My order of preference is Unified Access model , EPDP, and Sub Pro.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Stephanie 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>>>>> Subject:	High Interest Topics for ICANN64 — Need Your Input
>>>>>> Date:	Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:04:19 +0000
>>>>>> From:	Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com>
>>>>>> To:	joankerr at fbsc.org <joankerr at fbsc.org>, bruna.mrtns at gmail.com <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>, Claudia Selli  <cs574w at intl.att.com>, Graeme Bunton  <gbunton at tucows.com>, wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>, Brian at Winterfeldt.law <Brian at Winterfeldt.law>, Donna.Austin at team.neustar <Donna.Austin at team.neustar>, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
>>>>>> CC:	nathalie.peregrine at icann.org <nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hello GNSO SG/C Chairs,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I need your urgent help in prioritizing the following list of possible HIT session topics for ICANN64. We will select two from this list. Please send me your top 3 issues from the following list, in order of preference 1, 2 and 3:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Potential topics identified for remaining two CC/HIT slots are listed as follows:
>>>>>> EPDP
>>>>>> GDPR
>>>>>> New gTLD Subsequent Procedures
>>>>>> ICANN Budget
>>>>>> Unified Model for Access and Accreditation
>>>>>> Universal Acceptance
>>>>>> Innovations in Top-Level Domains
>>>>>> IDN TLDs
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> The plan is to finalize this at the SO/AC level by Thursday, so please send me your feedback as soon as possible. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Keith
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>> -- 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> Elsa Saade
>>> Consultant
>>> Gulf Centre for Human Rights
>>> Twitter: @Elsa_Saade
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
> -- 
> --
> 
> Elsa Saade
> Consultant
> Gulf Centre for Human Rights
> Twitter: @Elsa_Saade
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20181117/9eaeb3fc/attachment.htm>