[NCSG-PC] Fwd: High Interest Topics for ICANN64 — Need Your Input

[Elsa S]

Hey Steph,

No tangible thoughts yet, but I think the main problem might be that HIT
sessions have had a precedent of “reopening questions that had been
answered and dealt with” when it comes to community Q&A and that they could
be (for the lack of a better term) a loss of time for presenters who could
be doing policy work instead of a HIT session, especially when it came to
EPDP in the last session for instance.

Maybe a more interesting way to do HIT sessions would be multiple High
Interest Topic Summaries in the same amount of time that one HIT session
normally takes? Maybe I’m just being too optimistic here but it would kind
of be a reporting time for the community from the WGs and more of a
motivator for individuals or SGs/Cs to get engaged in the WG, or keep an
eye out on Public Comments concerning those topics, or at least signing up
to mailing lists and engaging if they find something problematic.

This might not make much sense, but that’s what I could think of at the top
of my burntout head!

Best,

E.
—

On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 9:28 PM Stephanie Perrin <
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:

> Good idea Elsa....do we have tangible thoughts for improvement?
>
> SP
> On 2018-11-14 20:54, Elsa S wrote:
>
> Just a side note that in the last GNSO council meeting in Barcelona, there
> was a discussion about HIT sessions not being as efficient as they should
> be! So maybe if we have a chance to comment we could suggest a change in
> structure of that kind of session so that we would be consistent with our
> comments in the council?
>
> E.
> —
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:35 AM Stephanie Perrin <
> stephanie at digitaldiscretion.ca> wrote:
>
>> There is a lot to talk about though Fik.....on UAM.
>> On 2018-11-13 11:07, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> By Kobe meeting, EPDP should be ready to start access discussion . We
>> shouldn't have a separate session on UAM per se as it will overlap.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018, 00:53 Stephanie Perrin <
>> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca wrote:
>>
>>> we need a decision on this asap folks.  My order of preference is
>>> Unified Access model , EPDP, and Sub Pro.
>>>
>>> Stephanie
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> Subject: High Interest Topics for ICANN64 — Need Your Input
>>> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:04:19 +0000
>>> From: Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com> <kdrazek at verisign.com>
>>> To: joankerr at fbsc.org <joankerr at fbsc.org> <joankerr at fbsc.org>,
>>> bruna.mrtns at gmail.com <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>,
>>> Claudia Selli <cs574w at intl.att.com> <cs574w at intl.att.com>, Graeme
>>> Bunton <gbunton at tucows.com> <gbunton at tucows.com>,
>>> wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
>>> <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>, Brian at Winterfeldt.law
>>> <Brian at Winterfeldt.law> <Brian at Winterfeldt.law>,
>>> Donna.Austin at team.neustar <Donna.Austin at team.neustar>
>>> <Donna.Austin at team.neustar>, Stephanie Perrin
>>> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
>>> CC: nathalie.peregrine at icann.org <nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
>>> <nathalie.peregrine at icann.org>
>>>
>>> Hello GNSO SG/C Chairs,
>>>
>>> I need your urgent help in prioritizing the following list of possible
>>> HIT session topics for ICANN64. We will select two from this list. Please
>>> send me your top 3 issues from the following list, in order of preference
>>> 1, 2 and 3:
>>>
>>> Potential topics identified for remaining two CC/HIT slots are listed as
>>> follows:
>>>
>>>    - EPDP
>>>       - GDPR
>>>       - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures
>>>       - ICANN Budget
>>>       - Unified Model for Access and Accreditation
>>>       - Universal Acceptance
>>>       - Innovations in Top-Level Domains
>>>       - IDN TLDs
>>>
>>>
>>> The plan is to finalize this at the SO/AC level by Thursday, so please
>>> send me your feedback as soon as possible.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Keith
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
> --
> --
>
> Elsa Saade
> Consultant
> Gulf Centre for Human Rights
> Twitter: @Elsa_Saade
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-- 
--

Elsa Saade
Consultant
Gulf Centre for Human Rights
Twitter: @Elsa_Saade
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20181114/4718f07e/attachment.htm>