[NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] For your input - questions for the ICANN Board following the adoption of the temporary specification

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi,

I expect the first question with the board will be about scope. based on
discussion threads in council list and the last council call, some groups
may push for including more topics i.e. accreditation model and they can
use the annex in the temporary specification as an argument.  personally, I
will think we have to have a limited scope for EPDP while building for a
long-term solution (either by "reforming" RDS PDP or start a new process, I
have no idea). anyway, we will know more from the board about their
expectation and I think they will prepare for that.

from previous experience with CCWG, I think the board approach will have
the liaison(s) to the EPDP. as we have several restricted options, I don't
see how the board will have more participation or if there is any real
desire for that (the board seems to have a focal point by the issue in
general). indeed keeping informing the board, the council and the community
will be critical, a monthly update would be the least we can do. another
point to clarify is other ACs involvement but that is up to council to
figure out.

Best,

Rafik
Le dim. 27 mai 2018 à 23:07, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> a écrit :

> Thanks, Rafik.
>
> I have been thinking about what questions to ask, and it is difficult
> because it is still not clear to me what is within the scope of the ePDP
> (and what isn't). So that makes it difficult to think about what resources
> we'll need to do the ePDP well.
>
> That aside, I think it would be helpful to know how involved the Board
> itself would like to be with this ePDP. Do they want a liaison on the ePDP,
> or would there be a desire for participation? Would it be appropriate to
> have a monthly stocktaking/status update with the Board (in addition to
> with the Council, who really needs to be kept informed)?
>
> Ayden
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On 25 May 2018 1:23 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> we can discuss which questions to be asked for the meeting with the board.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
> Date: ven. 25 mai 2018 à 07:55
> Subject: [council] For your input - questions for the ICANN Board
> following the adoption of the temporary specification
> To: council at gnso.icann.org <council at gnso.icann.org>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> As discussed during the Council meeting earlier today, please include your
> input as well as that of your respective SG/C with regards to which
> questions / issues that should be discussed with the ICANN Board following
> the adoption of the temporary policy specification in this google doc:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1I5fyQTqYmcKft-4yiOKP6WMcCST0a1sZGtAY1jofAb4/edit?usp=sharing.
> A number of initial questions that have come up in the various
> conversations have been included as a starting point.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Marika
>
>
>
> *Marika Konings*
>
> *Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation
> for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) *
>
> *Email: marika.konings at icann.org <marika.konings at icann.org>  *
>
>
>
> *Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO*
>
> *Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses
> <http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages
> <http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers>. *
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> council mailing list
> council at gnso.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/council
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180528/26a6d63f/attachment.htm>