[NCSG-PC] latest letter, the response to the March 8 GDPR compliance model

[farzaneh badii]

If you look at the text in the document you see that I removed the words
"we support the government..." and added "governments can". So that we dont
just blatantly support them but acknowledge their ability.

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 2:27 AM Stephanie Perrin <
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:

> Strategically, suggesting that government can come up with the
> accreditation of their own people is, in my view, important
> diplomatically.  We know that this will be achallenge for them, but who
> would you suggest to replace the GAC in this regard?
>
> A five pager to respond to a 60 pager, in my view, is a minimal response,
> I dont understand why you think it is indefensible. I can do a executive
> summary if you like, with bullets. this already went out in the Art 29
> letter.  I think it will add a page ultimately, but happy to do it, it is
> not a problem.
>
> Stephanie Perrin
> On 2018-03-10 23:38, farzaneh badii wrote:
>
> I have made minor changes to this.
>
> We don't represent end users. so I corrected that.
>
> I don't think we support GAC to come up with the list of law enforcement
> agencies who can have access to data. so I changed that to GAC can ....
>
> What we need to push for is really to say: tiered access can't happen now,
> adopt model 3 move the tiered access after adoption if you can't then a
> group of community members can work with GAC for coming up with layered
> access.
>
> A five pager document submitted now would be read by no one, would be
> difficult to advocate for. We have to highlight our points on the first
> page, be short and sweet and provide our analysis on the rest of the pages
> (maybe move the points you are making to the first and second page.
>
> This is advice only. Take it or leave it. I am not the subject matter
> expert.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Farzaneh
>
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 3:45 AM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I support its submission.
>>
>> Ayden
>>
>> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 23:43, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> please review the letter, as we discussed during the NCSG inreach session
>> today and due to the urgency we have to send the letter within 24hours. so
>> we have to get it done by tomorrow.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>>
>>
>> 2018-03-10 18:01 GMT-04:00 Stephanie Perrin <
>> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>:
>>
>>> Ok folks, here is the letter as currently drafted.   COmments welcome.
>>> Thanks to Ayden for many useful comments
>>>
>>> Stephanie
>>>
>>> ______________________________ _________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>>
> --
Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180311/95d22089/attachment.htm>