[NCSG-PC] latest letter, the response to the March 8 GDPR compliance model

[Stephanie Perrin]

Strategically, suggesting that government can come up with the 
accreditation of their own people is, in my view, important 
diplomatically. We know that this will be achallenge for them, but who 
would you suggest to replace the GAC in this regard?

A five pager to respond to a 60 pager, in my view, is a minimal 
response, I dont understand why you think it is indefensible. I can do a 
executive summary if you like, with bullets. this already went out in 
the Art 29 letter.  I think it will add a page ultimately, but happy to 
do it, it is not a problem.

Stephanie Perrin

On 2018-03-10 23:38, farzaneh badii wrote:
> I have made minor changes to this.
>
> We don't represent end users. so I corrected that.
>
> I don't think we support GAC to come up with the list of law 
> enforcement agencies who can have access to data. so I changed that to 
> GAC can ....
>
> What we need to push for is really to say: tiered access can't happen 
> now, adopt model 3 move the tiered access after adoption if you can't 
> then a group of community members can work with GAC for coming up with 
> layered access.
>
> A five pager document submitted now would be read by no one, would be 
> difficult to advocate for. We have to highlight our points on the 
> first page, be short and sweet and provide our analysis on the rest of 
> the pages (maybe move the points you are making to the first and 
> second page.
>
> This is advice only. Take it or leave it. I am not the subject matter 
> expert.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Farzaneh
>
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 3:45 AM, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com 
> <mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>> wrote:
>
>     I support its submission.
>
>     Ayden
>
>     Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>
>
>     On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 23:43, Rafik Dammak
>     <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>     Hi all,
>>
>>     please review the letter, as we discussed during the NCSG inreach
>>     session today and due to the urgency we have to send the letter
>>     within 24hours. so we have to get it done by tomorrow.
>>
>>     Best,
>>
>>     Rafik
>>
>>
>>
>>     2018-03-10 18:01 GMT-04:00 Stephanie Perrin
>>     <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
>>     <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>>:
>>
>>         Ok folks, here is the letter as currently drafted.   COmments
>>         welcome.  Thanks to Ayden for many useful comments
>>
>>         Stephanie
>>
>>
>>         ______________________________ _________________
>>         NCSG-PC mailing list
>>         NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>>         https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>         <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
>>
>>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     NCSG-PC mailing list
>     NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>     https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>     <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180311/8878899b/attachment.htm>