[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Panama high-interest session on Accred & Access to non-public Whois data (Tuesday June 26, 2018; 17:00 – 18:30 local time)

Stephanie Perrin stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
Sat Jun 23 20:09:00 EEST 2018 

Yes, long term and can build on best practice IF that practice is 
formulated consistent with DP law.  I suspect Palage is closer to a good 
input document for that process than the others...

am sitting on top floor bar (nice quiet place I must say) but sweltering 
hot. Plans to retire here are off...

cheers steph

On 2018-06-23 11:54, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi Stephanie,
>
> I think due to limited time for panellists and to make an impact, it 
> would be better to focus on accreditation model and what should cover 
> from DP stance not just the focus on purpose or users.with that you 
> can set the records right on the matter and can debunk the claims 
> possibly made by other speakers. I cannot speak about standards part 
> but I assume that will happen later and you mentioned that is 
> long-term project?
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> Le dim. 24 juin 2018 à 01:30, Stephanie Perrin 
> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca 
> <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>> a écrit :
>
>     as usual, not a moment too soon.  Thoughts and suggestions would
>     be most welcome.  I thought I would point to the IG blog Farzi
>     just did, and point out the different jobs that standards would
>     do.  I think we need to dissect, for clairty, what we mean by
>     accreditation, what we mean by standards, and what aspects of data
>     protection law are factilitated by a standards based approach.  As
>     Farzi's blog points out (although not in the DP or standards
>     perspective) the rush to come up with a system and procedure that
>     perpetuates the status quo is not helpful in discerning or
>     illuminating what is necessary for a data controller/processor to
>     give a third party access.
>
>     I will see if I can hook up with Palage in the meantime.
>
>     cheers Steph
>
>
>
>     -------- Forwarded Message --------
>     Subject: 	Panama high-interest session on Accred & Access to
>     non-public Whois data (Tuesday June 26, 2018; 17:00 – 18:30 local
>     time)
>     Date: 	Sat, 23 Jun 2018 16:02:41 +0000
>     From: 	Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>
>     <mailto:sdelbianco at netchoice.org>
>     To: 	Goran Marby <goran.marby at icann.org>
>     <mailto:goran.marby at icann.org>, John Jeffrey
>     <john.jeffrey at icann.org> <mailto:john.jeffrey at icann.org>, Alex
>     Deacon <alex at colevalleyconsulting.com>
>     <mailto:alex at colevalleyconsulting.com>, kdrazek at verisign.com
>     <mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com> <kdrazek at verisign.com>
>     <mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com>, Stephanie Perrin
>     <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
>     <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>, Rod Rasmussen
>     <rod at rodrasmussen.com> <mailto:rod at rodrasmussen.com>,
>     Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu
>     <mailto:Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu>
>     <Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu>
>     <mailto:Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu>, Fabricio Vayra
>     <FVayra at perkinscoie.com> <mailto:FVayra at perkinscoie.com>, Michael
>     Palage <Michael at palage.com> <mailto:Michael at palage.com>
>     CC: 	Cyrus Namazi <cyrus.namazi at icann.org>
>     <mailto:cyrus.namazi at icann.org>, Brian Winterfeldt
>     <brian at winterfeldt.law> <mailto:brian at winterfeldt.law>, Selli,
>     Claudia <cs574w at intl.att.com> <mailto:cs574w at intl.att.com>, Manal
>     Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg> <mailto:manal at tra.gov.eg>
>
>
>
>     Just a note to confirm you as panelists for Tuesday’s session in
>     Panama, regarding accreditation and access to non-Public Whois
>     data.  The panel is described below, and here is the panel lineup:
>
>     Goran Marby and/or John Jeffrey, ICANN.   See ICANN Org’s proposed
>     Unified Access Model
>     <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/framework-elements-unified-access-model-for-discussion-18jun18-en.pdf>
>     , and chart
>     <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-unified-access-model-summary-elements-18jun18-en.pdf>
>     comparing with IPC/BC and Palage models.
>
>     Alex Deacon, BC
>
>     Keith Drazek, RySG
>
>     Stephanie Perrin, NCSG
>
>     Rod Rasmussen, SSAC.   See SSAC Advisory here
>     <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-101-en.pdf>.
>
>     Cathrin Bauer-Bulst, European Commission & GAC PSWG
>
>     Fabricio Vayra, IPC.   See IPC/BC model for Accredited Access
>     (v1.6)
>     <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-whois-accreditation-access-model-v1.6-18jun18-en.pdf>
>
>     Michael Palage, author of “Philly Special” model for
>     Differentiated Registrant Data Access
>     <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/palage-differentiated-registrant-data-access-model-philly-special-v2.0-18jun18-en.pdf>
>
>     It’s a large panel, but we need these representative views to
>     advance a unified model for accreditation & access.   We will not
>     do opening statements by each panelist, but will instead give you
>     ample time to answer structured questions about designing and
>     implementing a unified model.
>
>     As your moderator, I’d like to propose the following questions and
>     timing, and I welcome your thoughts on this:
>
>     Introduction of Panelists – Brief overview of topics – /Steve
>     DelBianco/ (figure 10 minutes, since we rarely begin on-time)
>
>     1. What are the most important characteristics we need in an
>     Accredited Access model? (16 minutes, allowing 2 minutes per panelist)
>
>     2. What is your assessment of ICANN Org’s proposed Unified Access
>     Model
>     <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/framework-elements-unified-access-model-for-discussion-18jun18-en.pdf>,
>     and how could that model be improved? (16 minutes, allowing 2
>     minutes per panelist)
>
>     3. Talk about your preferred way to implement this model.  Should
>     ICANN Org do another Temp Spec, or let GNSO Council develop one
>     via an expedited PDP, or find a way for Org and GNSO to work
>     together? (16 minutes, allowing 2 minutes per panelist)
>
>     4. Brief conclusory remarks from each panelist, on key concerns or
>     considerations in implementing an Accredited Access model. (10
>     minutes – allowing 1 minutes per panelist)
>
>     Audience questions and answer (20 minutes)
>
>     *_Session 2: Accreditation and Access to Non-Public WHOIS Data
>     Post-GDPR (Tuesday June 26, 2018; 17:00 – 18:30 local time)_*
>
>     **
>
>     *Description*: Under the Temporary Specification passed by the
>     ICANN Board implementing the interim GDPR compliance model, there
>     is a placeholder for an accreditation system to allowuniform
>     access to non-public WHOIS data by appropriate users for
>     legitimate purposes.  Under the Temp Spec, contracted parties must
>     provide non-public registration data for legitimate purposes
>     specified in Section 4 of the Temp Spec, unless the request for
>     access is outweighed by the domain name registrant’s fundamental
>     right to privacy. TheArticle 29 Working Party issued a statement
>     <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/statement-edpb-whois-27may18-en.pdf>--
>     endorsed by the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) --
>     encouraging ICANN to develop an access model.
>
>     There is now no uniform system for approving legitimate users
>     foraccess to non-public registration data forlegitimate purposes,
>     so contracted parties mustperform ad-hoc individual review of each
>     request for data. Three models have been proposed thus far:
>
>     The IPC/BC model for Accredited Access (v1.6)
>     <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-whois-accreditation-access-model-v1.6-18jun18-en.pdf>
>
>     The “Philly Special” model for Differentiated Registrant Data
>     Access
>     <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/palage-differentiated-registrant-data-access-model-philly-special-v2.0-18jun18-en.pdf>
>
>     ICANN Org’s proposed Unified Access Model
>     <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/framework-elements-unified-access-model-for-discussion-18jun18-en.pdf>
>
>     It is urgent that ICANN Org, European regulators, and the
>     community come together ona workable credentialed access system
>     for non-public WHOIS data for legitimate purposes.  In this
>     cross-community session, panelists will engage with the community
>     to discuss developing a credentialed access system and next steps
>     for implement via a Temporary Specification or as part of the
>     expedited policy development process conducted by the GNSO.
>
>     -- 
>
>     Steve DelBianco
>
>     President
>
>     NetChoice
>
>     +1.703.615.6206
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     NCSG-PC mailing list
>     NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>     https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180623/c9cce3bd/attachment.htm>

More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list