[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Panama high-interest session on Accred & Access to non-public Whois data (Tuesday June 26, 2018; 17:00 – 18:30 local time)

Sat Jun 23 19:54:46 EEST 2018

Hi Stephanie,

I think due to limited time for panellists and to make an impact, it would
be better to focus on accreditation model and what should cover from DP
stance not just the focus on purpose or users.with that you can set the
records right on the matter and can debunk the claims possibly made by
other speakers. I cannot speak about standards part but I assume that will
happen later and you mentioned that is long-term project?

Best,

Rafik

Le dim. 24 juin 2018 à 01:30, Stephanie Perrin <
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> a écrit :

> as usual, not a moment too soon.  Thoughts and suggestions would be most
> welcome.  I thought I would point to the IG blog Farzi just did, and point
> out the different jobs that standards would do.  I think we need to
> dissect, for clairty, what we mean by accreditation, what we mean by
> standards, and what aspects of data protection law are factilitated by a
> standards based approach.  As Farzi's blog points out (although not in the
> DP or standards perspective) the rush to come up with a system and
> procedure that perpetuates the status quo is not helpful in discerning or
> illuminating what is necessary for a data controller/processor to give a
> third party access.
>
> I will see if I can hook up with Palage in the meantime.
>
> cheers Steph
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Panama high-interest session on Accred & Access to non-public
> Whois data (Tuesday June 26, 2018; 17:00 – 18:30 local time)
> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 16:02:41 +0000
> From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>
> <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>
> To: Goran Marby <goran.marby at icann.org> <goran.marby at icann.org>, John
> Jeffrey <john.jeffrey at icann.org> <john.jeffrey at icann.org>, Alex Deacon
> <alex at colevalleyconsulting.com> <alex at colevalleyconsulting.com>,
> kdrazek at verisign.com <kdrazek at verisign.com> <kdrazek at verisign.com>,
> Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>, Rod Rasmussen <rod at rodrasmussen.com>
> <rod at rodrasmussen.com>, Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu
> <Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu> <Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu>,
> Fabricio Vayra <FVayra at perkinscoie.com> <FVayra at perkinscoie.com>, Michael
> Palage <Michael at palage.com> <Michael at palage.com>
> CC: Cyrus Namazi <cyrus.namazi at icann.org> <cyrus.namazi at icann.org>, Brian
> Winterfeldt <brian at winterfeldt.law> <brian at winterfeldt.law>, Selli,
> Claudia <cs574w at intl.att.com> <cs574w at intl.att.com>, Manal Ismail
> <manal at tra.gov.eg> <manal at tra.gov.eg>
>
> Just a note to confirm you as panelists for Tuesday’s session in Panama,
> regarding accreditation and access to non-Public Whois data.  The panel is
> described below, and here is the panel lineup:
>
>
>
> Goran Marby and/or John Jeffrey, ICANN.   See ICANN Org’s proposed Unified
> Access Model
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/framework-elements-unified-access-model-for-discussion-18jun18-en.pdf>
> , and chart
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-unified-access-model-summary-elements-18jun18-en.pdf>
> comparing with IPC/BC and Palage models.
>
> Alex Deacon, BC
>
> Keith Drazek, RySG
>
> Stephanie Perrin, NCSG
>
> Rod Rasmussen, SSAC.   See SSAC Advisory here
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-101-en.pdf>.
>
> Cathrin Bauer-Bulst, European Commission & GAC PSWG
>
> Fabricio Vayra, IPC.   See IPC/BC model for Accredited Access (v1.6)
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-whois-accreditation-access-model-v1.6-18jun18-en.pdf>
>
> Michael Palage, author of “Philly Special” model for Differentiated
> Registrant Data Access
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/palage-differentiated-registrant-data-access-model-philly-special-v2.0-18jun18-en.pdf>
>
>
>
> It’s a large panel, but we need these representative views to advance a
> unified model for accreditation & access.   We will not do opening
> statements by each panelist, but will instead give you ample time to answer
> structured questions about designing and implementing a unified model.
>
>
>
> As your moderator, I’d like to propose the following questions and timing,
> and I welcome your thoughts on this:
>
>
>
> Introduction of Panelists – Brief overview of topics – *Steve DelBianco* (figure
> 10 minutes, since we rarely begin on-time)
>
>
>
> 1. What are the most important characteristics we need in an Accredited
> Access model?  (16 minutes, allowing 2 minutes per panelist)
>
>
>
> 2. What is your assessment of ICANN Org’s proposed Unified Access Model
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/framework-elements-unified-access-model-for-discussion-18jun18-en.pdf>,
> and how could that model be improved?     (16 minutes, allowing 2 minutes
> per panelist)
>
>
>
> 3. Talk about your preferred way to implement this model.  Should ICANN
> Org do another Temp Spec, or let GNSO Council develop one via an expedited
> PDP, or find a way for Org and GNSO to work together?      (16 minutes,
> allowing 2 minutes per panelist)
>
>
>
> 4. Brief conclusory remarks from each panelist, on key concerns or
> considerations in implementing an Accredited Access model.  (10 minutes –
> allowing 1 minutes per panelist)
>
>
>
> Audience questions and answer (20 minutes)
>
>
>
> *Session 2: Accreditation and Access to Non-Public WHOIS Data Post-GDPR
> (Tuesday June 26, 2018; 17:00 – 18:30 local time)*
>
>
>
> *Description*: Under the Temporary Specification passed by the ICANN
> Board implementing the interim GDPR compliance model, there is a
> placeholder for an accreditation system to allow uniform access to
> non-public WHOIS data by appropriate users for legitimate purposes.  Under
> the Temp Spec, contracted parties must provide non-public registration
> data for legitimate purposes specified in Section 4 of the Temp Spec,
> unless the request for access is outweighed by the domain name registrant’s
> fundamental right to privacy.  The Article 29 Working Party issued a
> statement
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/statement-edpb-whois-27may18-en.pdf> --
> endorsed by the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) -- encouraging
> ICANN to develop an access model.
>
>
>
> There is now no uniform system for approving legitimate users for access
> to non-public registration data for legitimate purposes, so contracted
> parties must perform ad-hoc individual review of each request for data.   Three
> models have been proposed thus far:
>
> The IPC/BC model for Accredited Access (v1.6)
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-whois-accreditation-access-model-v1.6-18jun18-en.pdf>
>
> The “Philly Special” model for Differentiated Registrant Data Access
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/palage-differentiated-registrant-data-access-model-philly-special-v2.0-18jun18-en.pdf>
>
> ICANN Org’s proposed Unified Access Model
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/framework-elements-unified-access-model-for-discussion-18jun18-en.pdf>
>
>
>
> It is urgent that ICANN Org, European regulators, and the community come
> together on a workable credentialed access system for non-public WHOIS
> data for legitimate purposes.  In this cross-community session, panelists
> will engage with the community to discuss developing a credentialed access
> system and next steps for implement via a Temporary Specification or as
> part of the expedited policy development process conducted by the GNSO.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Steve DelBianco
>
> President
>
> NetChoice
>
> +1.703.615.6206
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180624/44845f52/attachment.htm>