[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Panama high-interest session on Accred & Access to non-public Whois data (Tuesday June 26, 2018; 17:00 – 18:30 local time)

[Stephanie Perrin]

as usual, not a moment too soon.  Thoughts and suggestions would be most 
welcome.  I thought I would point to the IG blog Farzi just did, and 
point out the different jobs that standards would do.  I think we need 
to dissect, for clairty, what we mean by accreditation, what we mean by 
standards, and what aspects of data protection law are factilitated by a 
standards based approach.  As Farzi's blog points out (although not in 
the DP or standards perspective) the rush to come up with a system and 
procedure that perpetuates the status quo is not helpful in discerning 
or illuminating what is necessary for a data controller/processor to 
give a third party access.

I will see if I can hook up with Palage in the meantime.

cheers Steph



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Panama high-interest session on Accred & Access to non-public 
Whois data (Tuesday June 26, 2018; 17:00 – 18:30 local time)
Date: 	Sat, 23 Jun 2018 16:02:41 +0000
From: 	Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>
To: 	Goran Marby <goran.marby at icann.org>, John Jeffrey 
<john.jeffrey at icann.org>, Alex Deacon <alex at colevalleyconsulting.com>, 
kdrazek at verisign.com <kdrazek at verisign.com>, Stephanie Perrin 
<stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>, Rod Rasmussen 
<rod at rodrasmussen.com>, Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu 
<Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu>, Fabricio Vayra 
<FVayra at perkinscoie.com>, Michael Palage <Michael at palage.com>
CC: 	Cyrus Namazi <cyrus.namazi at icann.org>, Brian Winterfeldt 
<brian at winterfeldt.law>, Selli, Claudia <cs574w at intl.att.com>, Manal 
Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg>



Just a note to confirm you as panelists for Tuesday’s session in Panama, 
regarding accreditation and access to non-Public Whois data.  The panel 
is described below, and here is the panel lineup:

Goran Marby and/or John Jeffrey, ICANN.   See ICANN Org’s proposed 
Unified Access Model 
<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/framework-elements-unified-access-model-for-discussion-18jun18-en.pdf> 
, and chart 
<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-unified-access-model-summary-elements-18jun18-en.pdf> 
comparing with IPC/BC and Palage models.

Alex Deacon, BC

Keith Drazek, RySG

Stephanie Perrin, NCSG

Rod Rasmussen, SSAC. See SSAC Advisory here 
<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-101-en.pdf>.

Cathrin Bauer-Bulst, European Commission & GAC PSWG

Fabricio Vayra, IPC. See IPC/BC model for Accredited Access (v1.6) 
<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-whois-accreditation-access-model-v1.6-18jun18-en.pdf>

Michael Palage, author of “Philly Special” model for Differentiated 
Registrant Data Access 
<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/palage-differentiated-registrant-data-access-model-philly-special-v2.0-18jun18-en.pdf>

It’s a large panel, but we need these representative views to advance a 
unified model for accreditation & access.   We will not do opening 
statements by each panelist, but will instead give you ample time to 
answer structured questions about designing and implementing a unified 
model.

As your moderator, I’d like to propose the following questions and 
timing, and I welcome your thoughts on this:

Introduction of Panelists – Brief overview of topics – /Steve DelBianco/ 
(figure 10 minutes, since we rarely begin on-time)

1. What are the most important characteristics we need in an Accredited 
Access model? (16 minutes, allowing 2 minutes per panelist)

2. What is your assessment of ICANN Org’s proposed Unified Access Model 
<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/framework-elements-unified-access-model-for-discussion-18jun18-en.pdf>, 
and how could that model be improved? (16 minutes, allowing 2 minutes 
per panelist)

3. Talk about your preferred way to implement this model. Should ICANN 
Org do another Temp Spec, or let GNSO Council develop one via an 
expedited PDP, or find a way for Org and GNSO to work together? (16 
minutes, allowing 2 minutes per panelist)

4. Brief conclusory remarks from each panelist, on key concerns or 
considerations in implementing an Accredited Access model. (10 minutes – 
allowing 1 minutes per panelist)

Audience questions and answer (20 minutes)

*_Session 2: Accreditation and Access to Non-Public WHOIS Data Post-GDPR 
(Tuesday June 26, 2018; 17:00 – 18:30 local time)_*

**

*Description*: Under the Temporary Specification passed by the ICANN 
Board implementing the interim GDPR compliance model, there is a 
placeholder for an accreditation system to allowuniform access to 
non-public WHOIS data by appropriate users for legitimate purposes.  
Under the Temp Spec, contracted parties must provide non-public 
registration data for legitimate purposes specified in Section 4 of the 
Temp Spec, unless the request for access is outweighed by the domain 
name registrant’s fundamental right to privacy. TheArticle 29 Working 
Party issued a statement 
<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/statement-edpb-whois-27may18-en.pdf>-- 
endorsed by the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) -- encouraging 
ICANN to develop an access model.

There is now no uniform system for approving legitimate users foraccess 
to non-public registration data forlegitimate purposes, so contracted 
parties mustperform ad-hoc individual review of each request for data. 
Three models have been proposed thus far:

The IPC/BC model for Accredited Access (v1.6) 
<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-whois-accreditation-access-model-v1.6-18jun18-en.pdf>

The “Philly Special” model for Differentiated Registrant Data Access 
<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/palage-differentiated-registrant-data-access-model-philly-special-v2.0-18jun18-en.pdf>

ICANN Org’s proposed Unified Access Model 
<https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/framework-elements-unified-access-model-for-discussion-18jun18-en.pdf>

It is urgent that ICANN Org, European regulators, and the community come 
together ona workable credentialed access system for non-public WHOIS 
data for legitimate purposes.  In this cross-community session, 
panelists will engage with the community to discuss developing a 
credentialed access system and next steps for implement via a Temporary 
Specification or as part of the expedited policy development process 
conducted by the GNSO.

-- 

Steve DelBianco

President

NetChoice

+1.703.615.6206

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180623/79ffe0ff/attachment.htm>