[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Panama high-interest session on Accred & Access to non-public Whois data (Tuesday June 26, 2018; 17:00 – 18:30 local time)
Stephanie Perrin
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
Sat Jun 23 20:06:34 EEST 2018
Yes I had the chance to have breakfast with Graeme Bunton this morning.
Interesting. I am glad he is going to run again, many of the registrars
are getting just worn out with this bullshit.
cheers Steph
On 2018-06-23 11:55, farzaneh badii wrote:
> Thanks a lot stephanie
>
> Yes I think we should move towards taking acc/standardaization
> discussion out of this for the moment. Focus on access. Also we
> should not call those sessions high interest sessions because they are
> cross community. I know icann tagging is confusing. The difference
> betwee the two is that high interest session can be ogranized by one
> group but cc should be organized by various groups. Which wasnt the
> case this time the louder i shouted the more was ignored but will
> bring it up again at leaders session.
>
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 12:30 PM Stephanie Perrin
> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
> <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>> wrote:
>
> as usual, not a moment too soon. Thoughts and suggestions would
> be most welcome. I thought I would point to the IG blog Farzi
> just did, and point out the different jobs that standards would
> do. I think we need to dissect, for clairty, what we mean by
> accreditation, what we mean by standards, and what aspects of data
> protection law are factilitated by a standards based approach. As
> Farzi's blog points out (although not in the DP or standards
> perspective) the rush to come up with a system and procedure that
> perpetuates the status quo is not helpful in discerning or
> illuminating what is necessary for a data controller/processor to
> give a third party access.
>
> I will see if I can hook up with Palage in the meantime.
>
> cheers Steph
>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Panama high-interest session on Accred & Access to
> non-public Whois data (Tuesday June 26, 2018; 17:00 – 18:30 local
> time)
> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 16:02:41 +0000
> From: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>
> <mailto:sdelbianco at netchoice.org>
> To: Goran Marby <goran.marby at icann.org>
> <mailto:goran.marby at icann.org>, John Jeffrey
> <john.jeffrey at icann.org> <mailto:john.jeffrey at icann.org>, Alex
> Deacon <alex at colevalleyconsulting.com>
> <mailto:alex at colevalleyconsulting.com>, kdrazek at verisign.com
> <mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com> <kdrazek at verisign.com>
> <mailto:kdrazek at verisign.com>, Stephanie Perrin
> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
> <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>, Rod Rasmussen
> <rod at rodrasmussen.com> <mailto:rod at rodrasmussen.com>,
> Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu
> <mailto:Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu>
> <Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu>
> <mailto:Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu>, Fabricio Vayra
> <FVayra at perkinscoie.com> <mailto:FVayra at perkinscoie.com>, Michael
> Palage <Michael at palage.com> <mailto:Michael at palage.com>
> CC: Cyrus Namazi <cyrus.namazi at icann.org>
> <mailto:cyrus.namazi at icann.org>, Brian Winterfeldt
> <brian at winterfeldt.law> <mailto:brian at winterfeldt.law>, Selli,
> Claudia <cs574w at intl.att.com> <mailto:cs574w at intl.att.com>, Manal
> Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg> <mailto:manal at tra.gov.eg>
>
>
>
> Just a note to confirm you as panelists for Tuesday’s session in
> Panama, regarding accreditation and access to non-Public Whois
> data. The panel is described below, and here is the panel lineup:
>
> Goran Marby and/or John Jeffrey, ICANN. See ICANN Org’s proposed
> Unified Access Model
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/framework-elements-unified-access-model-for-discussion-18jun18-en.pdf>
> , and chart
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-unified-access-model-summary-elements-18jun18-en.pdf>
> comparing with IPC/BC and Palage models.
>
> Alex Deacon, BC
>
> Keith Drazek, RySG
>
> Stephanie Perrin, NCSG
>
> Rod Rasmussen, SSAC. See SSAC Advisory here
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-101-en.pdf>.
>
> Cathrin Bauer-Bulst, European Commission & GAC PSWG
>
> Fabricio Vayra, IPC. See IPC/BC model for Accredited Access
> (v1.6)
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-whois-accreditation-access-model-v1.6-18jun18-en.pdf>
>
> Michael Palage, author of “Philly Special” model for
> Differentiated Registrant Data Access
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/palage-differentiated-registrant-data-access-model-philly-special-v2.0-18jun18-en.pdf>
>
> It’s a large panel, but we need these representative views to
> advance a unified model for accreditation & access. We will not
> do opening statements by each panelist, but will instead give you
> ample time to answer structured questions about designing and
> implementing a unified model.
>
> As your moderator, I’d like to propose the following questions and
> timing, and I welcome your thoughts on this:
>
> Introduction of Panelists – Brief overview of topics – /Steve
> DelBianco/ (figure 10 minutes, since we rarely begin on-time)
>
> 1. What are the most important characteristics we need in an
> Accredited Access model? (16 minutes, allowing 2 minutes per panelist)
>
> 2. What is your assessment of ICANN Org’s proposed Unified Access
> Model
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/framework-elements-unified-access-model-for-discussion-18jun18-en.pdf>,
> and how could that model be improved? (16 minutes, allowing 2
> minutes per panelist)
>
> 3. Talk about your preferred way to implement this model. Should
> ICANN Org do another Temp Spec, or let GNSO Council develop one
> via an expedited PDP, or find a way for Org and GNSO to work
> together? (16 minutes, allowing 2 minutes per panelist)
>
> 4. Brief conclusory remarks from each panelist, on key concerns or
> considerations in implementing an Accredited Access model. (10
> minutes – allowing 1 minutes per panelist)
>
> Audience questions and answer (20 minutes)
>
> *_Session 2: Accreditation and Access to Non-Public WHOIS Data
> Post-GDPR (Tuesday June 26, 2018; 17:00 – 18:30 local time)_*
>
> **
>
> *Description*: Under the Temporary Specification passed by the
> ICANN Board implementing the interim GDPR compliance model, there
> is a placeholder for an accreditation system to allowuniform
> access to non-public WHOIS data by appropriate users for
> legitimate purposes. Under the Temp Spec, contracted parties must
> provide non-public registration data for legitimate purposes
> specified in Section 4 of the Temp Spec, unless the request for
> access is outweighed by the domain name registrant’s fundamental
> right to privacy. TheArticle 29 Working Party issued a statement
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/statement-edpb-whois-27may18-en.pdf>--
> endorsed by the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) --
> encouraging ICANN to develop an access model.
>
> There is now no uniform system for approving legitimate users
> foraccess to non-public registration data forlegitimate purposes,
> so contracted parties mustperform ad-hoc individual review of each
> request for data. Three models have been proposed thus far:
>
> The IPC/BC model for Accredited Access (v1.6)
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/draft-whois-accreditation-access-model-v1.6-18jun18-en.pdf>
>
> The “Philly Special” model for Differentiated Registrant Data
> Access
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/palage-differentiated-registrant-data-access-model-philly-special-v2.0-18jun18-en.pdf>
>
> ICANN Org’s proposed Unified Access Model
> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/framework-elements-unified-access-model-for-discussion-18jun18-en.pdf>
>
> It is urgent that ICANN Org, European regulators, and the
> community come together ona workable credentialed access system
> for non-public WHOIS data for legitimate purposes. In this
> cross-community session, panelists will engage with the community
> to discuss developing a credentialed access system and next steps
> for implement via a Temporary Specification or as part of the
> expedited policy development process conducted by the GNSO.
>
> --
>
> Steve DelBianco
>
> President
>
> NetChoice
>
> +1.703.615.6206
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
> --
> Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180623/eb08ee33/attachment.htm>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list