[NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] For your review - EPDP Initiation Request and EPDP Team Charter Templates

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi all,

to facilitate our discussion and working together  on common positons, I
uploaded the charter into google doc here
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rIuqrSlKCDwyVj-UiMRExyjh-sGddZzb3ihX-gB8yrQ/edit

the initiation will just get the language mostly from the charter.
let's use the document.

Best,

Rafik

Le jeu. 14 juin 2018 à 17:17, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Hi ,
>
> indeed we should flesh out positions here before sharing in council list
> and coordinate our responses. I hope we can do tha bettert from now on.
>
> I dont think vice-chair can be a role for external facilitator or mediator
> as chairing involve admin work (scheduling calls, review notes etc),
> project management tasks, reporting to council and community and so on. a
> facilitator and/or meditaor can be there as support for leadership team or
> chair and intervene for some cases like faciliating discussion or resolve
> conflict. they can be seens as resources.
> There is also the idea of legal counsel we should introduce more in the
> discussion. that is important to be agreed in term of resourcing.
>
> I understand that staff would like to have the minimal number in
> leadership time to ensure quick responses when they ask them , however
> there is always need to have vice-chair or co-chair to replace chair if
> needed or be a backup. we can argue that EPDP team is not a long time
> commitment, in such case we will need some mechanisms to ensure backup and
> handle chair absence.
>
> for board, 1 liaison will be enough as board wll organize its work via a
> board caucus and monitor the discussion. we need to be careful about the
> number as we also want to keep representation from SO/AC to 1 and so
> keeping the overall EPDP team size small.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> Le jeu. 14 juin 2018 à 16:47, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> Initial thoughts on EPDP leadership:
>>
>> 1 chair (from community)
>> 1 vice chair (external facilitator / mediator)
>> no more than that
>> leadership not counted as part of the stakeholder group appointees (3/SG)
>>
>> but I can be persuaded otherwise... happy to hear other options.
>>
>> Best wishes, Ayden
>>
>>
>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> On 14 June 2018 4:39 AM, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> other than the standard language in template in certain sections that is
>> found usually in other charters, we are not supposed to be constrained and
>> the council as drafting team will have to discuss them.
>> So better as group we get to agree on some points. I think for the
>> composition/membership we have clear position as we discussed that in our
>> calls. for leadership, we need to discuss that further.
>> for the scope, we need to go through the temporary specification
>> including the annex, identify areas related policy to separate from
>> implementation, and do a triage of what is priorirty for this EPDP from our
>> standpoint. We will see later if there are commonalities with other groups.
>> We can create a working document we can populate and do that in
>> collaborative manner, not just discussing here. I understand some points
>> about picket fence were made but we have to do our homework to identify the
>> issues .
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>>
>> Le mer. 13 juin 2018 à 08:08, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> For further discussion...
>>>
>>> Ayden
>>>
>>> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Marika Konings<marika.konings at icann.org>
>>> Date: On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 01:01
>>> Subject: Fwd: [council] For your review - EPDP Initiation Request and
>>> EPDP Team Charter Templates
>>> To: council at gnso.icann.org <council at gnso.icann.org>
>>> Cc:
>>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> As discussed during today’s extraordinary Council meeting, staff has
>>> gone ahead and prepared a template for the EPDP Initiation Request as well
>>> as the EPDP Team Charter (see attached). As there is some duplication
>>> between the Initiation Request and the Charter, staff would like to suggest
>>> that you focus your attention on the EPDP Team charter for now. Once
>>> elements such as scope and team composition have been agreed on, these can
>>> then be lifted from the charter into the EPDP Initiation Request. Also note
>>> that staff has taken the liberty to prepopulate some of the sections of the
>>> charter to facilitate your deliberations. These entries are either based on
>>> existing charter language / practices / procedures and/or aspects that have
>>> come up in the context of the discussions to date, including the PDP 3.0
>>> conversations. In addition, staff has flagged some items highlighted in
>>> yellow that will require further feedback before draft language can be
>>> added. Of course, it is up to you to edit / delete / add as you deem
>>> appropriate. If there is anything further that staff can do to facilitate
>>> your deliberations and drafting, please let me know.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Marika
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Marika Konings*
>>>
>>> *Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation
>>> for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) *
>>>
>>> *Email: marika.konings at icann.org <marika.konings at icann.org>  *
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO*
>>>
>>> *Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses
>>> <http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages
>>> <http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers>. *
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180614/4c103ee3/attachment.htm>