[NCSG-PC] Updated Public Comments Draft to be reviewed

Fri Jul 27 15:46:01 EEST 2018

Oh sorry I thought they were asking to comment that on both

On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 8:37 AM Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Farzaneh,
>
> I think that is more relevant information transparency initiative: "The
> Information Transparency Initiative, which relates to simplifying access to
> documents and other non-tabular information. This initiative is independent
> of and complementary to the Open Data Initiative."
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> Le ven. 27 juil. 2018 à 21:31, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> a écrit :
>
>> just jumping in on something not very relevant to the thread but I was
>> wondering if we could ask ICANN to put the transcripts of all meetings
>> since whenever transcripts becomes available in one place? At the moment we
>> have to go to many different websites. Sorry... Last minute. It's not too
>> important...
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 4:24 AM Ayden Férdeline <ayden at ferdeline.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> There are over 230 data sets. What is the harm in having one more data
>>> set? I think is is important and relevant, and I note that an existing data
>>> set is community travel expenditure. Why one standard for community
>>> expenditure, and another for staff?
>>>
>>> Ayden
>>>
>>>
>>> On 27 Jul 2018, at 09:16, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> Agree with Rafik here. I do not support adding the point about staff
>>> travel. I don’t believe this data is important or relevant.
>>> Cheers,
>>>  Tanya
>>>
>>> On Fri 27. Jul 2018 at 09:11, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Ayden,
>>>>
>>>> yes, I proposed to delete that one.
>>>> I don't see why it is important or relevant for us to know about staff
>>>> travel with regard to open data. I think we made the same point regard
>>>> staff travel several times in different public comments. to be honest, I am
>>>> personally not interested in such information, other PC members can chime
>>>> in and support or not.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>> Le ven. 27 juil. 2018 à 15:46, Ayden Férdeline <ayden at ferdeline.com> a
>>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> I see that one of my edits to the ODI comment was rejected, and I’d
>>>>> like it to be inserted.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the list of omissions, I added a request for a new data set:
>>>>>
>>>>> *Full disclosure of staff travel expenses, including class of air
>>>>> travel (first, business, premium economy, economy), number of days in
>>>>> advance of travel that the trip was booked, department, reason for travel,
>>>>> and total cost of the trip; *
>>>>>
>>>>> The reason for the rejection was that it was “financial information.”
>>>>>
>>>>> I think this is a very relevant request, and I also note that an
>>>>> *existing* data set proposed by ICANN org for the ODI is community
>>>>> travel expenditure.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, I’d like us to have access to the same information from staff. I
>>>>> know it is unlikely that we’ll get it, but I think it’s important to ask.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>>
>>>>> Ayden
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 27 Jul 2018, at 04:49, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks for the review and comments:
>>>>>
>>>>> those are targeted for submission on 27th july.
>>>>> - SSAC Comment is finalized and comments resolved. ready to go. I
>>>>> don't see any objection.
>>>>> - Fellowship comment, the latest paragraphs were deleted, so checking
>>>>> if the current text capture the comments there
>>>>> - ODI comment, Elsa will resolve the comments and last edits. document
>>>>> to be clean up.
>>>>>
>>>>> please continue the review and raise any concern. if there is
>>>>> objection I will submit the latest versions (and send them to PC for
>>>>> reference). if there is any issue, we can amend and resubmit.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>
>>>>> Le mar. 24 juil. 2018 à 16:05, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> here the updated list of public comment the PC needs to review for
>>>>>> endorsement:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    - [Urgent] SSAC2 review, deadline 27th July,
>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ttzoZUlN0PU-J5j1o5MG8fjfnqjjAyNsImIYGnexFGw/edit
>>>>>>    - [Urgent] Open Data Initiative, 27th July,
>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZmWcncubvRV572mZyU0pRKTkgD8K7sT4qPXcn01lk0U/edit
>>>>>>    - [Urgent] Draft Proposal on fellowship, 27th,
>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rUjAgOGtp3FLX6AsrGpmqC6mnQ17qNRkqQJHpvPYh-Q/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>    ,
>>>>>>    - Long-term Option, 31st July,
>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VItIeJMKjQMinu_IvJ1uJOvXSfTc_4U5ay_k7F6beOQ/edit
>>>>>>    - Short-term Options, 31st July,
>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Oh6cxVsFJXheU94A2ieivuz6komPn8fI9f_i_hMqgg8/edit
>>>>>>    - Initial Report on the Protections for Certain Red Cross Names
>>>>>>    in all gTLDs, 31st July, https://docs.google.com/document/d/19xnBgqFoH4eOzgeMQug9y_2oXsCPka6efc9C7TjNQDg/edit
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    - The Independent Review Process Implementation Oversight Team
>>>>>>    (IRP-IOT) Draft Recommendations, 10th August,
>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XlDp0qcVUbZYH0qZdijqsoQWQG5V2jsK1NFoYmsRgSc/edit
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le dim. 22 juil. 2018 à 19:58, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> we have several public comments drafts to review for this month:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    - SSAC2 review, deadline 27th July,
>>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ttzoZUlN0PU-J5j1o5MG8fjfnqjjAyNsImIYGnexFGw/edit
>>>>>>>    - Open Data Initiative, 27th July,
>>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZmWcncubvRV572mZyU0pRKTkgD8K7sT4qPXcn01lk0U/edit
>>>>>>>    - Draft Proposal on fellowship, 27th,
>>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rUjAgOGtp3FLX6AsrGpmqC6mnQ17qNRkqQJHpvPYh-Q/edit?usp=sharing,
>>>>>>>    that is still not shared yet in the main NCSG list but I will do it.
>>>>>>>    - Long-term Option, 31st July,
>>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VItIeJMKjQMinu_IvJ1uJOvXSfTc_4U5ay_k7F6beOQ/edit
>>>>>>>    - Short-term Options, 31st July,
>>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Oh6cxVsFJXheU94A2ieivuz6komPn8fI9f_i_hMqgg8/edit
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> please review those comments for endorsment in coming days.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>
>> --
>> Farzaneh
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
> --
Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180727/5b13ea99/attachment.htm>