[NCSG-PC] Updated Public Comments Draft to be reviewed

Rafik Dammak rafik.dammak at gmail.com
Fri Jul 27 15:53:14 EEST 2018 

Hi Farzaneh,

it is confusing when you check the spreadsheet it has all kind of
(raw)datasets. few datasets include a list of meetings, minutes,
transcripts like for CCWG published as a page.  however, I am not sure that
solves the issue of finding all meetings transcripts as I believe this more
an issue of organizing documents, tagging, versioning them and make the
search more accurate.

Best,

Rafik

Le ven. 27 juil. 2018 à 21:46, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Oh sorry I thought they were asking to comment that on both
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 8:37 AM Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Farzaneh,
>>
>> I think that is more relevant information transparency initiative: "The
>> Information Transparency Initiative, which relates to simplifying access to
>> documents and other non-tabular information. This initiative is independent
>> of and complementary to the Open Data Initiative."
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> Le ven. 27 juil. 2018 à 21:31, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> a écrit :
>>
>>> just jumping in on something not very relevant to the thread but I was
>>> wondering if we could ask ICANN to put the transcripts of all meetings
>>> since whenever transcripts becomes available in one place? At the moment we
>>> have to go to many different websites. Sorry... Last minute. It's not too
>>> important...
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 4:24 AM Ayden Férdeline <ayden at ferdeline.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> There are over 230 data sets. What is the harm in having one more data
>>>> set? I think is is important and relevant, and I note that an existing data
>>>> set is community travel expenditure. Why one standard for community
>>>> expenditure, and another for staff?
>>>>
>>>> Ayden
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 27 Jul 2018, at 09:16, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> Agree with Rafik here. I do not support adding the point about staff
>>>> travel. I don’t believe this data is important or relevant.
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>  Tanya
>>>>
>>>> On Fri 27. Jul 2018 at 09:11, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Ayden,
>>>>>
>>>>> yes, I proposed to delete that one.
>>>>> I don't see why it is important or relevant for us to know about staff
>>>>> travel with regard to open data. I think we made the same point regard
>>>>> staff travel several times in different public comments. to be honest, I am
>>>>> personally not interested in such information, other PC members can chime
>>>>> in and support or not.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>
>>>>> Le ven. 27 juil. 2018 à 15:46, Ayden Férdeline <ayden at ferdeline.com>
>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> I see that one of my edits to the ODI comment was rejected, and I’d
>>>>>> like it to be inserted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the list of omissions, I added a request for a new data set:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Full disclosure of staff travel expenses, including class of air
>>>>>> travel (first, business, premium economy, economy), number of days in
>>>>>> advance of travel that the trip was booked, department, reason for travel,
>>>>>> and total cost of the trip; *
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The reason for the rejection was that it was “financial information.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think this is a very relevant request, and I also note that an
>>>>>> *existing* data set proposed by ICANN org for the ODI is community
>>>>>> travel expenditure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, I’d like us to have access to the same information from staff. I
>>>>>> know it is unlikely that we’ll get it, but I think it’s important to ask.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ayden
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 27 Jul 2018, at 04:49, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks for the review and comments:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> those are targeted for submission on 27th july.
>>>>>> - SSAC Comment is finalized and comments resolved. ready to go. I
>>>>>> don't see any objection.
>>>>>> - Fellowship comment, the latest paragraphs were deleted, so checking
>>>>>> if the current text capture the comments there
>>>>>> - ODI comment, Elsa will resolve the comments and last edits.
>>>>>> document to be clean up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> please continue the review and raise any concern. if there is
>>>>>> objection I will submit the latest versions (and send them to PC for
>>>>>> reference). if there is any issue, we can amend and resubmit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le mar. 24 juil. 2018 à 16:05, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> here the updated list of public comment the PC needs to review for
>>>>>>> endorsement:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    - [Urgent] SSAC2 review, deadline 27th July,
>>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ttzoZUlN0PU-J5j1o5MG8fjfnqjjAyNsImIYGnexFGw/edit
>>>>>>>    - [Urgent] Open Data Initiative, 27th July,
>>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZmWcncubvRV572mZyU0pRKTkgD8K7sT4qPXcn01lk0U/edit
>>>>>>>    - [Urgent] Draft Proposal on fellowship, 27th,
>>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rUjAgOGtp3FLX6AsrGpmqC6mnQ17qNRkqQJHpvPYh-Q/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>>    ,
>>>>>>>    - Long-term Option, 31st July,
>>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VItIeJMKjQMinu_IvJ1uJOvXSfTc_4U5ay_k7F6beOQ/edit
>>>>>>>    - Short-term Options, 31st July,
>>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Oh6cxVsFJXheU94A2ieivuz6komPn8fI9f_i_hMqgg8/edit
>>>>>>>    - Initial Report on the Protections for Certain Red Cross Names
>>>>>>>    in all gTLDs, 31st July, https://docs.google.com/document/d/19xnBgqFoH4eOzgeMQug9y_2oXsCPka6efc9C7TjNQDg/edit
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    - The Independent Review Process Implementation Oversight Team
>>>>>>>    (IRP-IOT) Draft Recommendations, 10th August,
>>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XlDp0qcVUbZYH0qZdijqsoQWQG5V2jsK1NFoYmsRgSc/edit
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Le dim. 22 juil. 2018 à 19:58, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> we have several public comments drafts to review for this month:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    - SSAC2 review, deadline 27th July,
>>>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ttzoZUlN0PU-J5j1o5MG8fjfnqjjAyNsImIYGnexFGw/edit
>>>>>>>>    - Open Data Initiative, 27th July,
>>>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZmWcncubvRV572mZyU0pRKTkgD8K7sT4qPXcn01lk0U/edit
>>>>>>>>    - Draft Proposal on fellowship, 27th,
>>>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rUjAgOGtp3FLX6AsrGpmqC6mnQ17qNRkqQJHpvPYh-Q/edit?usp=sharing,
>>>>>>>>    that is still not shared yet in the main NCSG list but I will do it.
>>>>>>>>    - Long-term Option, 31st July,
>>>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VItIeJMKjQMinu_IvJ1uJOvXSfTc_4U5ay_k7F6beOQ/edit
>>>>>>>>    - Short-term Options, 31st July,
>>>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Oh6cxVsFJXheU94A2ieivuz6komPn8fI9f_i_hMqgg8/edit
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> please review those comments for endorsment in coming days.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Farzaneh
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>
>> --
> Farzaneh
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180727/95bf9ac3/attachment.htm>

More information about the NCSG-PC mailing list