[NCSG-PC] Updated Public Comments Draft to be reviewed

Fri Jul 27 15:36:58 EEST 2018

Hi Farzaneh,

I think that is more relevant information transparency initiative: "The
Information Transparency Initiative, which relates to simplifying access to
documents and other non-tabular information. This initiative is independent
of and complementary to the Open Data Initiative."

Best,

Rafik

Le ven. 27 juil. 2018 à 21:31, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> just jumping in on something not very relevant to the thread but I was
> wondering if we could ask ICANN to put the transcripts of all meetings
> since whenever transcripts becomes available in one place? At the moment we
> have to go to many different websites. Sorry... Last minute. It's not too
> important...
>
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 4:24 AM Ayden Férdeline <ayden at ferdeline.com>
> wrote:
>
>> There are over 230 data sets. What is the harm in having one more data
>> set? I think is is important and relevant, and I note that an existing data
>> set is community travel expenditure. Why one standard for community
>> expenditure, and another for staff?
>>
>> Ayden
>>
>>
>> On 27 Jul 2018, at 09:16, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>> Agree with Rafik here. I do not support adding the point about staff
>> travel. I don’t believe this data is important or relevant.
>> Cheers,
>>  Tanya
>>
>> On Fri 27. Jul 2018 at 09:11, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ayden,
>>>
>>> yes, I proposed to delete that one.
>>> I don't see why it is important or relevant for us to know about staff
>>> travel with regard to open data. I think we made the same point regard
>>> staff travel several times in different public comments. to be honest, I am
>>> personally not interested in such information, other PC members can chime
>>> in and support or not.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>> Le ven. 27 juil. 2018 à 15:46, Ayden Férdeline <ayden at ferdeline.com> a
>>> écrit :
>>>
>>>> I see that one of my edits to the ODI comment was rejected, and I’d
>>>> like it to be inserted.
>>>>
>>>> In the list of omissions, I added a request for a new data set:
>>>>
>>>> *Full disclosure of staff travel expenses, including class of air
>>>> travel (first, business, premium economy, economy), number of days in
>>>> advance of travel that the trip was booked, department, reason for travel,
>>>> and total cost of the trip; *
>>>>
>>>> The reason for the rejection was that it was “financial information.”
>>>>
>>>> I think this is a very relevant request, and I also note that an
>>>> *existing* data set proposed by ICANN org for the ODI is community
>>>> travel expenditure.
>>>>
>>>> So, I’d like us to have access to the same information from staff. I
>>>> know it is unlikely that we’ll get it, but I think it’s important to ask.
>>>>
>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>
>>>> Ayden
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 27 Jul 2018, at 04:49, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> thanks for the review and comments:
>>>>
>>>> those are targeted for submission on 27th july.
>>>> - SSAC Comment is finalized and comments resolved. ready to go. I don't
>>>> see any objection.
>>>> - Fellowship comment, the latest paragraphs were deleted, so checking
>>>> if the current text capture the comments there
>>>> - ODI comment, Elsa will resolve the comments and last edits. document
>>>> to be clean up.
>>>>
>>>> please continue the review and raise any concern. if there is objection
>>>> I will submit the latest versions (and send them to PC for reference). if
>>>> there is any issue, we can amend and resubmit.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>> Le mar. 24 juil. 2018 à 16:05, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
>>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> here the updated list of public comment the PC needs to review for
>>>>> endorsement:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    - [Urgent] SSAC2 review, deadline 27th July,
>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ttzoZUlN0PU-J5j1o5MG8fjfnqjjAyNsImIYGnexFGw/edit
>>>>>    - [Urgent] Open Data Initiative, 27th July,
>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZmWcncubvRV572mZyU0pRKTkgD8K7sT4qPXcn01lk0U/edit
>>>>>    - [Urgent] Draft Proposal on fellowship, 27th,
>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rUjAgOGtp3FLX6AsrGpmqC6mnQ17qNRkqQJHpvPYh-Q/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>    ,
>>>>>    - Long-term Option, 31st July,
>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VItIeJMKjQMinu_IvJ1uJOvXSfTc_4U5ay_k7F6beOQ/edit
>>>>>    - Short-term Options, 31st July,
>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Oh6cxVsFJXheU94A2ieivuz6komPn8fI9f_i_hMqgg8/edit
>>>>>    - Initial Report on the Protections for Certain Red Cross Names
>>>>>    in all gTLDs, 31st July, https://docs.google.com/document/d/19xnBgqFoH4eOzgeMQug9y_2oXsCPka6efc9C7TjNQDg/edit
>>>>>
>>>>>    - The Independent Review Process Implementation Oversight Team
>>>>>    (IRP-IOT) Draft Recommendations, 10th August,
>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XlDp0qcVUbZYH0qZdijqsoQWQG5V2jsK1NFoYmsRgSc/edit
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>
>>>>> Le dim. 22 juil. 2018 à 19:58, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> we have several public comments drafts to review for this month:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    - SSAC2 review, deadline 27th July,
>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ttzoZUlN0PU-J5j1o5MG8fjfnqjjAyNsImIYGnexFGw/edit
>>>>>>    - Open Data Initiative, 27th July,
>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZmWcncubvRV572mZyU0pRKTkgD8K7sT4qPXcn01lk0U/edit
>>>>>>    - Draft Proposal on fellowship, 27th,
>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rUjAgOGtp3FLX6AsrGpmqC6mnQ17qNRkqQJHpvPYh-Q/edit?usp=sharing,
>>>>>>    that is still not shared yet in the main NCSG list but I will do it.
>>>>>>    - Long-term Option, 31st July,
>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VItIeJMKjQMinu_IvJ1uJOvXSfTc_4U5ay_k7F6beOQ/edit
>>>>>>    - Short-term Options, 31st July,
>>>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Oh6cxVsFJXheU94A2ieivuz6komPn8fI9f_i_hMqgg8/edit
>>>>>>
>>>>>> please review those comments for endorsment in coming days.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
> --
> Farzaneh
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180727/afea6d75/attachment.htm>