[NCSG-PC] Updated Public Comments Draft to be reviewed

[Stephanie Perrin]

I may be unique in that I am the only one on this group who has lived 
under access to information legislation as a bureaucrat, and 
administered the law.  It is routine to ask for this stuff, and it has 
had a very edifying effect on travel expenses in the government I must 
say, over the past 40 years in my jurisdiction.  I think we should ask 
for it, support Ayden. It is an important budget item, and lack of 
planning has a drastic impact on budgets.

Stephanie

On 2018-07-27 09:11, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi Ayden,
>
> yes, I proposed to delete that one.
> I don't see why it is important or relevant for us to know about staff 
> travel with regard to open data. I think we made the same point regard 
> staff travel several times in different public comments. to be honest, 
> I am personally not interested in such information, other PC members 
> can chime in and support or not.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> Le ven. 27 juil. 2018 à 15:46, Ayden Férdeline <ayden at ferdeline.com 
> <mailto:ayden at ferdeline.com>> a écrit :
>
>     I see that one of my edits to the ODI comment was rejected, and
>     I’d like it to be inserted.
>
>     In the list of omissions, I added a request for a new data set:
>
>     /Full disclosure of staff travel expenses, including class of air
>     travel (first, business, premium economy, economy), number of days
>     in advance of travel that the trip was booked, department, reason
>     for travel, and total cost of the trip; /
>
>     The reason for the rejection was that it was “financial information.”
>
>     I think this is a very relevant request, and I also note that an
>     *existing* data set proposed by ICANN org for the ODI is community
>     travel expenditure.
>
>     So, I’d like us to have access to the same information from staff.
>     I know it is unlikely that we’ll get it, but I think it’s
>     important to ask.
>
>     Best wishes,
>
>     Ayden
>
>
>>     On 27 Jul 2018, at 04:49, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>     <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi all,
>>
>>     thanks for the review and comments:
>>
>>     those are targeted for submission on 27th july.
>>     - SSAC Comment is finalized and comments resolved. ready to go. I
>>     don't see any objection.
>>     - Fellowship comment, the latest paragraphs were deleted, so
>>     checking if the current text capture the comments there
>>     - ODI comment, Elsa will resolve the comments and last edits.
>>     document to be clean up.
>>
>>     please continue the review and raise any concern. if there is
>>     objection I will submit the latest versions (and send them to PC
>>     for reference). if there is any issue, we can amend and resubmit.
>>
>>     Best,
>>
>>     Rafik
>>
>>     Le mar. 24 juil. 2018 à 16:05, Rafik Dammak
>>     <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> a écrit :
>>
>>         Hi all,
>>
>>         here the updated list of public comment the PC needs to
>>         review for endorsement:
>>
>>           * [Urgent] SSAC2 review, deadline 27th July,
>>             https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ttzoZUlN0PU-J5j1o5MG8fjfnqjjAyNsImIYGnexFGw/edit
>>           * [Urgent] Open Data Initiative, 27th July,
>>             https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZmWcncubvRV572mZyU0pRKTkgD8K7sT4qPXcn01lk0U/edit
>>           * [Urgent] Draft Proposal on fellowship,
>>             27th,https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rUjAgOGtp3FLX6AsrGpmqC6mnQ17qNRkqQJHpvPYh-Q/edit?usp=sharing,
>>
>>           * Long-term Option, 31st July,
>>             https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VItIeJMKjQMinu_IvJ1uJOvXSfTc_4U5ay_k7F6beOQ/edit
>>           * Short-term Options, 31st July,
>>             https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Oh6cxVsFJXheU94A2ieivuz6komPn8fI9f_i_hMqgg8/edit
>>          *
>>             Initial Report on the Protections for Certain Red Cross
>>             Names
>>             in all gTLDs, 31st July,
>>             https://docs.google.com/document/d/19xnBgqFoH4eOzgeMQug9y_2oXsCPka6efc9C7TjNQDg/edit
>>             <https://docs.google.com/document/d/19xnBgqFoH4eOzgeMQug9y_2oXsCPka6efc9C7TjNQDg/edit>
>>           * The Independent Review Process Implementation Oversight
>>             Team (IRP-IOT) Draft Recommendations, 10th August,
>>             https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XlDp0qcVUbZYH0qZdijqsoQWQG5V2jsK1NFoYmsRgSc/edit
>>
>>         Best,
>>
>>         Rafik
>>
>>         Le dim. 22 juil. 2018 à 19:58, Rafik Dammak
>>         <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> a
>>         écrit :
>>
>>             Hi all,
>>
>>             we have several public comments drafts to review for this
>>             month:
>>
>>               * SSAC2 review, deadline 27th July,
>>                 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ttzoZUlN0PU-J5j1o5MG8fjfnqjjAyNsImIYGnexFGw/edit
>>               * Open Data Initiative, 27th July,
>>                 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZmWcncubvRV572mZyU0pRKTkgD8K7sT4qPXcn01lk0U/edit
>>               * Draft Proposal on fellowship, 27th,
>>                 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rUjAgOGtp3FLX6AsrGpmqC6mnQ17qNRkqQJHpvPYh-Q/edit?usp=sharing,
>>                 that is still not shared yet in the main NCSG list
>>                 but I will do it.
>>               * Long-term Option, 31st July,
>>                 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VItIeJMKjQMinu_IvJ1uJOvXSfTc_4U5ay_k7F6beOQ/edit
>>               * Short-term Options, 31st July,
>>                 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Oh6cxVsFJXheU94A2ieivuz6komPn8fI9f_i_hMqgg8/edit
>>
>>             please review those comments for endorsment in coming days.
>>
>>             Best,
>>
>>             Rafik
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180727/4754e7de/attachment.htm>