[NCSG-PC] Updated Public Comments Draft to be reviewed

Fri Jul 27 10:31:06 EEST 2018

Hi,

Le ven. 27 juil. 2018 à 16:18, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> a
écrit :

> Hi Rafik,
>
> Yes, I have asked before, and I am reiterating the request by asking again.
>
> I think it is important that we have transparency around how much is being
> spent on staff travel and to which events, particularly when ICANN org is
> seeking to reduce its spend on community travel. It is not an insignificant
> chunk of the budget that we are talking about; from what I understand, it
> is over $10 million a year.
>
> I just noticed that another data set I requested has been proposed to be
> deleted:
>
> *Full details of any events sponsored by ICANN, including event name,
> location, date(s), whether the support was one-off or recurring, and the
> nature of the support (if financial, including figures in USD);*
>
>
that is an oversight, I have no problem with one. I will correct that.

> I think this data set is very important, and I would most definitely
> review it regularly, as would, I expect, other parts of the community.
>
>
if I understand correctly here, that is of particular interest for you as
you  are stating you will review it. I think it is better to use DIDP
mechanism then.

Best,

Rafik

> On 27 Jul 2018, at 09:11, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ayden,
>
> yes, I proposed to delete that one.
> I don't see why it is important or relevant for us to know about staff
> travel with regard to open data. I think we made the same point regard
> staff travel several times in different public comments. to be honest, I am
> personally not interested in such information, other PC members can chime
> in and support or not.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> Le ven. 27 juil. 2018 à 15:46, Ayden Férdeline <ayden at ferdeline.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> I see that one of my edits to the ODI comment was rejected, and I’d like
>> it to be inserted.
>>
>> In the list of omissions, I added a request for a new data set:
>>
>> *Full disclosure of staff travel expenses, including class of air travel
>> (first, business, premium economy, economy), number of days in advance of
>> travel that the trip was booked, department, reason for travel, and total
>> cost of the trip; *
>>
>> The reason for the rejection was that it was “financial information.”
>>
>> I think this is a very relevant request, and I also note that an
>> *existing* data set proposed by ICANN org for the ODI is community
>> travel expenditure.
>>
>> So, I’d like us to have access to the same information from staff. I know
>> it is unlikely that we’ll get it, but I think it’s important to ask.
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Ayden
>>
>>
>> On 27 Jul 2018, at 04:49, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> thanks for the review and comments:
>>
>> those are targeted for submission on 27th july.
>> - SSAC Comment is finalized and comments resolved. ready to go. I don't
>> see any objection.
>> - Fellowship comment, the latest paragraphs were deleted, so checking if
>> the current text capture the comments there
>> - ODI comment, Elsa will resolve the comments and last edits. document to
>> be clean up.
>>
>> please continue the review and raise any concern. if there is objection I
>> will submit the latest versions (and send them to PC for reference). if
>> there is any issue, we can amend and resubmit.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> Le mar. 24 juil. 2018 à 16:05, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> here the updated list of public comment the PC needs to review for
>>> endorsement:
>>>
>>>
>>>    - [Urgent] SSAC2 review, deadline 27th July,
>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ttzoZUlN0PU-J5j1o5MG8fjfnqjjAyNsImIYGnexFGw/edit
>>>    - [Urgent] Open Data Initiative, 27th July,
>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZmWcncubvRV572mZyU0pRKTkgD8K7sT4qPXcn01lk0U/edit
>>>    - [Urgent] Draft Proposal on fellowship, 27th,
>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rUjAgOGtp3FLX6AsrGpmqC6mnQ17qNRkqQJHpvPYh-Q/edit?usp=sharing
>>>    ,
>>>    - Long-term Option, 31st July,
>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VItIeJMKjQMinu_IvJ1uJOvXSfTc_4U5ay_k7F6beOQ/edit
>>>    - Short-term Options, 31st July,
>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Oh6cxVsFJXheU94A2ieivuz6komPn8fI9f_i_hMqgg8/edit
>>>    - Initial Report on the Protections for Certain Red Cross Names
>>>    in all gTLDs, 31st July, https://docs.google.com/document/d/19xnBgqFoH4eOzgeMQug9y_2oXsCPka6efc9C7TjNQDg/edit
>>>
>>>    - The Independent Review Process Implementation Oversight Team
>>>    (IRP-IOT) Draft Recommendations, 10th August,
>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XlDp0qcVUbZYH0qZdijqsoQWQG5V2jsK1NFoYmsRgSc/edit
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Rafik
>>>
>>> Le dim. 22 juil. 2018 à 19:58, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> a
>>> écrit :
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> we have several public comments drafts to review for this month:
>>>>
>>>>    - SSAC2 review, deadline 27th July,
>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ttzoZUlN0PU-J5j1o5MG8fjfnqjjAyNsImIYGnexFGw/edit
>>>>    - Open Data Initiative, 27th July,
>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZmWcncubvRV572mZyU0pRKTkgD8K7sT4qPXcn01lk0U/edit
>>>>    - Draft Proposal on fellowship, 27th,
>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rUjAgOGtp3FLX6AsrGpmqC6mnQ17qNRkqQJHpvPYh-Q/edit?usp=sharing,
>>>>    that is still not shared yet in the main NCSG list but I will do it.
>>>>    - Long-term Option, 31st July,
>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VItIeJMKjQMinu_IvJ1uJOvXSfTc_4U5ay_k7F6beOQ/edit
>>>>    - Short-term Options, 31st July,
>>>>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Oh6cxVsFJXheU94A2ieivuz6komPn8fI9f_i_hMqgg8/edit
>>>>
>>>> please review those comments for endorsment in coming days.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Rafik
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180727/cebaa8eb/attachment.htm>