[NCSG-PC] Seating of EPDP Alternates

[Stephanie Perrin]

I agree that we need 100% coverage whenever possible.  I think that how 
we arrange alternates will depend on frequency of calls, time rotation 
of calls (so far based on the doodle poll, not seeming much flexibility 
in the timing) and how people prefer to work.  I doubt that all the 
calls will happen to be in the middle of the night for me because the 
two most popular time zones are likely to be (based on overall 
composition) California and Washington.  I think perhaps we can do like 
we do for Council, let people select their alternative?  I expect a lot 
of these calls are going to be (as usual) in the middle of the night for 
David, we should perhaps be preparing a wee map of our timezones....

cheers Steph

On 2018-07-23 23:07, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just thought I’d start this conversation off now re: how and when we 
> appoint alternates.
>
> 1) I think it would be beneficial for the NCSG to have 100% coverage 
> on all calls; wherever possible we should not have calls where there 
> are not 6 NCSG members present. Is this reasonable?
>
> 2) How will we appoint alternates? Is this something that should be 
> arranged by the NCSG Chair, or is it an individual responsibility to 
> find an alternate to cover us where we are unavailable?
>
> 3) Do we want rotation to be in place to ensure that all alternates 
> are, to the greatest extent possible, invited to be an alternate for 
> an equal number of calls? Or should other factors be considered, i.e. 
> timezone of call/alternate, subject matter?
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Ayden
>
> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180724/d2dd3c4b/attachment.htm>