[NCSG-PC] Fwd: [Accred-Model] Version 1.7 of the Accreditation and Access Model

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi,

yes, they can try but there will be pushback. I think there is also the
ICANN org UAM in the mix (for which we need to decide if we will respond or
not). I won't speculate now but let's see how things will move in EPDP team
and in particular for the gating questions first.

Best,

Rafik

Le dim. 22 juil. 2018 à 09:04, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Stephanie
>
> Our stance on this is that we don't accept any accreditation
> /a
> ccess
> model that has not been developed by the community.
> Our
> very first question should b
> e
> whet
> her we need an accreditation model. We
> ​ ​
> provide our own access model when the opportunity arises. But by no means
> IPC/BC model can be accepted as a done deal or the only model that can be
> focused on.
>
> I think other councilors should be on the same page and if this gets
> discussed at the council support and bring up this view point.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 7:34 PM Stephanie Perrin <
> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>
>> as can be seen by the 62 page attachment, the BC and IPC have been busy
>> working on their accreditation model.  We have to focus on this fast, it
>> will be brought in as a fait accompli to the EPDP as soon as they can.  I
>> will do a markup as soon as I get the markup of the interim spec
>> done....but we need to know who is on the EPDP as soon as possible, and
>> start a new EPDP and observer list.
>>
>> cheers STeph
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: [Accred-Model] Version 1.7 of the Accreditation and Access Model
>> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 21:12:11 +0000
>> From: Vayra, Fabricio (Perkins Coie) <FVayra at perkinscoie.com>
>> <FVayra at perkinscoie.com>
>> To: 'accred-model at icann.org' <accred-model at icann.org>
>> <accred-model at icann.org>
>>
>> Attached for discussion and additional comment is version 1.7 of the
>> Accreditation and Access Model.
>>
>>
>>
>> Note that Section II has been formatted in a way to mirror the questions
>> posed by ICANN Org in its recent unified access model discussion paper.
>> This version 1.7 is meant to advance the very discussion on the critical
>> need for accreditation and access.
>>
>>
>>
>> Other notable updates to this version 1.7:
>>
>>    - The introduction section has been updated.
>>    - Annex A is now titled “Rationale” and edited accordingly.
>>    - Annex C is now populated with input from cybersecurity experts.
>>    - Annex F (verification and compliance for private parties) is now
>>    populated.
>>    - Annex G is a discussion on accreditation oversight and types.
>>
>>
>>
>> Again, thank you to those who made helpful contributions to advancing
>> this model.  We look forward to a robust discussion and further input.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Fabricio Vayra**| **Perkins Coie LLP*
>>
>> *PARTNER*
>>
>> D. +1.202.654.6255
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential
>> information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by
>> reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without
>> copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you.
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180722/0a54d3f4/attachment.htm>