[NCSG-PC] Fwd: [Accred-Model] Version 1.7 of the Accreditation and Access Model

[farzaneh badii]

Stephanie

Our stance on this is that we don't accept any accreditation
/a
ccess
model that has not been developed by the community.
Our
very first question should b
e
whet
her we need an accreditation model. We
​ ​
provide our own access model when the opportunity arises. But by no means
IPC/BC model can be accepted as a done deal or the only model that can be
focused on.

I think other councilors should be on the same page and if this gets
discussed at the council support and bring up this view point.

Thanks



On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 7:34 PM Stephanie Perrin <
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:

> as can be seen by the 62 page attachment, the BC and IPC have been busy
> working on their accreditation model.  We have to focus on this fast, it
> will be brought in as a fait accompli to the EPDP as soon as they can.  I
> will do a markup as soon as I get the markup of the interim spec
> done....but we need to know who is on the EPDP as soon as possible, and
> start a new EPDP and observer list.
>
> cheers STeph
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: [Accred-Model] Version 1.7 of the Accreditation and Access Model
> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 21:12:11 +0000
> From: Vayra, Fabricio (Perkins Coie) <FVayra at perkinscoie.com>
> <FVayra at perkinscoie.com>
> To: 'accred-model at icann.org' <accred-model at icann.org>
> <accred-model at icann.org>
>
> Attached for discussion and additional comment is version 1.7 of the
> Accreditation and Access Model.
>
>
>
> Note that Section II has been formatted in a way to mirror the questions
> posed by ICANN Org in its recent unified access model discussion paper.
> This version 1.7 is meant to advance the very discussion on the critical
> need for accreditation and access.
>
>
>
> Other notable updates to this version 1.7:
>
>    - The introduction section has been updated.
>    - Annex A is now titled “Rationale” and edited accordingly.
>    - Annex C is now populated with input from cybersecurity experts.
>    - Annex F (verification and compliance for private parties) is now
>    populated.
>    - Annex G is a discussion on accreditation oversight and types.
>
>
>
> Again, thank you to those who made helpful contributions to advancing this
> model.  We look forward to a robust discussion and further input.
>
>
>
> *Fabricio Vayra**| **Perkins Coie LLP*
>
> *PARTNER*
>
> D. +1.202.654.6255
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential
> information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by
> reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without
> copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180721/20da9dc3/attachment.htm>