[NCSG-PC] call for volunteers for EPDP team / Selection process

[Martin Pablo Silva Valent]

I support the idea of an extra day.

> On 17 Jul 2018, at 01:06, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
> 
> Please give an extra day.
> 
> SP
> On 2018-07-16 21:48, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I am resending this as we should talk about the selection process and agree on it.
>> the deadline for submission is the 18th. with the current number of applications, I want to suggest an extension of 24hours. it is also important to encourage more people to apply. if there is no objection, I will send the extension to the list (for now I am sending a reminder only)
>> 
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Rafik
>> 
>> Le jeu. 12 juil. 2018 à 09:02, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> a écrit :
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I accepted most the changes for the draft call https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YoV5UeR03Q9tFuhxDsWjbfftb4O8q2WZnRg-TRCD8nc/edit?ts=5b45fde2 <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YoV5UeR03Q9tFuhxDsWjbfftb4O8q2WZnRg-TRCD8nc/edit?ts=5b45fde2> . 
>> 
>> We shall receive soon the letter from GNSO about the appointment to EPDP team. I will update the draft with the latest relevant text (statement of participation and requirements) and other relevant annexes from that call.
>> 
>> Due to the time constraint, I will send the call this Thursday. there may some text that can be tweaked but I think we shouldn't spend more time doing that.  We cannot change the deadline as the date for sending names around the 20th. We should encourage candidates to apply but please be careful and indicate that doesn't mean automatic selection.
>> 
>> Selection:
>> There is a matrix for review and ranking in the document, please check it and let's discuss how we will manage the selection:
>> - Review: we will do individually the ranking based on the compiled applications (Maryam and I will work on the format for the matrix to get everyone input and including applicants info)
>> - Deliberations: last time for an appointment to SSC, the deliberations didn't happen in the PC list but with conference calls and private email thread. I don't have any strong preference (public or private) but in term of transparency, we can make the list of applicants public, taking notes of the process. Please share your thought on the matter. I think we will have at least one conference call, to be recorded and transcribed and so available when needed. 
>> - Decision-making: we work with rough consensus and we need to have a strong support for each representative to be appointed. The ranking will help us partly in splitting between members and alternates (it also depends on people choice).
>> 
>> this temporary process will be documented and updated.  All those elements will be helpful as input for general PC procedures related to the appointment (Farzaneh and me working on updating the draft to be shared soon).
>> 
>> later on, we can work on preparing for EPDP itself, more on substance,  and how we will liaise with the members. Several suggestions are made and indicated in the call for volunteers itself. NCSG PC has a role in term of support and input including regular EPDP related calls, giving guidance to representatives and getting regular updates. 
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Rafik
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180717/a1480bf8/attachment.htm>