[NCSG-PC] call for volunteers for EPDP team / Selection process

[Stephanie Perrin]

Please give an extra day.

SP

On 2018-07-16 21:48, Rafik Dammak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am resending this as we should talk about the selection process and 
> agree on it.
> the deadline for submission is the 18th. with the current number of 
> applications, I want to suggest an extension of 24hours. it is also 
> important to encourage more people to apply. if there is no objection, 
> I will send the extension to the list (for now I am sending a reminder 
> only)
>
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> Le jeu. 12 juil. 2018 à 09:02, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com 
> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> a écrit :
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     I accepted most the changes for the draft call
>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/1YoV5UeR03Q9tFuhxDsWjbfftb4O8q2WZnRg-TRCD8nc/edit?ts=5b45fde2
>     .
>
>     We shall receive soon the letter from GNSO about the appointment
>     to EPDP team. I will update the draft with the latest relevant
>     text (statement of participation and requirements) and other
>     relevant annexes from that call.
>
>     Due to the time constraint, I will send the call this Thursday.
>     there may some text that can be tweaked but I think we shouldn't
>     spend more time doing that. We cannot change the deadline as the
>     date for sending names around the 20th. We should encourage
>     candidates to apply but please be careful and indicate that
>     doesn't mean automatic selection.
>
>     Selection:
>     There is a matrix for review and ranking in the document, please
>     check it and let's discuss how we will manage the selection:
>     - Review: we will do individually the ranking based on the
>     compiled applications (Maryam and I will work on the format for
>     the matrix to get everyone input and including applicants info)
>     - Deliberations: last time for an appointment to SSC, the
>     deliberations didn't happen in the PC list but with conference
>     calls and private email thread. I don't have any strong preference
>     (public or private) but in term of transparency, we can make the
>     list of applicants public, taking notes of the process. Please
>     share your thought on the matter. I think we will have at least
>     one conference call, to be recorded and transcribed and so
>     available when needed.
>     - Decision-making: we work with rough consensus and we need to
>     have a strong support for each representative to be appointed. The
>     ranking will help us partly in splitting between members and
>     alternates (it also depends on people choice).
>
>     this temporary process will be documented and updated.  All those
>     elements will be helpful as input for general PC procedures
>     related to the appointment (Farzaneh and me working on updating
>     the draft to be shared soon).
>
>     later on, we can work on preparing for EPDP itself, more on
>     substance,  and how we will liaise with the members. Several
>     suggestions are made and indicated in the call for volunteers
>     itself. NCSG PC has a role in term of support and input including
>     regular EPDP related calls, giving guidance to representatives and
>     getting regular updates.
>
>     Best,
>
>     Rafik
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180717/90168f67/attachment.htm>