[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Updated scope section document + notes from today's EPDP scope call

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi,

thanks, Stephanie for sharing this draft.
indeed all those gating questions are of concerns and will impact the EPDP
progress. Adding the accredited access model to the EPDP defacto make it
longer than planned even if the team delivers the first final report for
the temporary spec part. That goes beyond the planned 6 months and I don't
think it is doable or can be acceptable to have an intense team like the
envisioned EPDP to be asked to figure out the access model too. I don't
know if the same volunteers or participants have the same background and
knowledge on the 2 different issues.
that should be treated by a separate team while we can argue about the
gating questions and which can be treated by the EPDP team. We can suggest
that the staggered phase can be started with some conditions TBD and not
automatically. those questions and responses can be approved separately
from the rest of other recommendations in the 1st final report.

Best,

Rafik

Le mar. 10 juil. 2018 à 05:38, Stephanie Perrin <
stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca> a écrit :

> I am not very happy with the "small team" efforts.  My comments are being
> ignored (surprise surprise) and the BC/IPC is being permitted to do back
> room drafting with staff, after coming in at the last minute (7 minutes to
> our meeting time) with new language.  I wanted that paragraph thrown out
> wholesale....
>
> And the questions are not all legit, and if the answers to the gating
> questions are not approved by the community, no matter, we go on regardless.
>
> please take a minute to think about this mess, we are being driven by
> artificial deadlines to finish and agree.
>
> steph
>
>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Updated scope section document + notes from today's EPDP scope
> call
> Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2018 20:08:28 +0000
> From: Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>
> <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>
> To: Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com> <kdrazek at verisign.com>, Susan
> Kawaguchi <susankpolicy at gmail.com> <susankpolicy at gmail.com>,
> stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>
> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>, Donna Austin
> <donna.austin at team.neustar> <donna.austin at team.neustar>,
> rafik.dammak at gmail.com <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>,
> Heather Forrest <haforrestesq at gmail.com> <haforrestesq at gmail.com>,
> gnso-secs at icann.org <gnso-secs at icann.org> <gnso-secs at icann.org>, Paul
> McGrady (Google Docs)
> <d+MTE3MzIyNzA1MjYyOTU3ODM2OTY2-MTE1MTM1NDA5ODg5NTEyMTUyMzA5 at docs.google.com>
> <d+MTE3MzIyNzA1MjYyOTU3ODM2OTY2-MTE1MTM1NDA5ODg5NTEyMTUyMzA5 at docs.google.com>,
> Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org> <marika.konings at icann.org>
>
> Hi Team,
>
>
>
> Following our call today, Donna and I have been working on the Google Doc
> from this morning’s EPDP Scope call.
>
>
>
> Here are the changes we made:
>
>
>
>    1. Based on the comments from Paul and others regarding the difficulty
>    of tracking comments in Google docs to the text, I inserted proposed text
>    into the body of the document where the commenter is proposing it should
>    go.  All proposed text is denoted by *italics and highlighted in
>    yellow* for ease of reference.  I’m hoping that will make it easier to
>    discuss on the call by zeroing in on highlighted text.
>    2. I have removed references to phases and inserted references to
>    gating questions. This text has been highlighted in yellow to note
>    that it has been changed.
>    3. Proposed gating questions have their numbering highlighted in green.
>    There may be other gating questions, but I highlighted the
>    originally-proposed gating questions as a starting point.
>    4. Donna and I added some comments on what the group appeared to
>    converge on during today’s call.
>    5. Lastly, I attached the notes from today’s call in case you find
>    these helpful as you’re going through the document.
>
>
>
> Here is the link to the Google Doc:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TlcnfYuRhrCKVB28Rvb_ra6mCIWvjUDnJyJhSjbG5_Q/edit
>
>
>
> Thank you, and please let me know if there is anything I can do to assist
> in your review of the document.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
> Caitlin
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180710/5c0b8a15/attachment.htm>