[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Updated scope section document + notes from today's EPDP scope call

[Stephanie Perrin]

I am not very happy with the "small team" efforts.  My comments are 
being ignored (surprise surprise) and the BC/IPC is being permitted to 
do back room drafting with staff, after coming in at the last minute (7 
minutes to our meeting time) with new language.  I wanted that paragraph 
thrown out wholesale....

And the questions are not all legit, and if the answers to the gating 
questions are not approved by the community, no matter, we go on regardless.

please take a minute to think about this mess, we are being driven by 
artificial deadlines to finish and agree.

steph




-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Updated scope section document + notes from today's EPDP scope 
call
Date: 	Mon, 9 Jul 2018 20:08:28 +0000
From: 	Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>
To: 	Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com>, Susan Kawaguchi 
<susankpolicy at gmail.com>, stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca 
<stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>, Donna Austin 
<donna.austin at team.neustar>, rafik.dammak at gmail.com 
<rafik.dammak at gmail.com>, Heather Forrest <haforrestesq at gmail.com>, 
gnso-secs at icann.org <gnso-secs at icann.org>, Paul McGrady (Google Docs) 
<d+MTE3MzIyNzA1MjYyOTU3ODM2OTY2-MTE1MTM1NDA5ODg5NTEyMTUyMzA5 at docs.google.com>, 
Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>



Hi Team,

Following our call today, Donna and I have been working on the Google 
Doc from this morning’s EPDP Scope call.

Here are the changes we made:

 1. Based on the comments from Paul and others regarding the difficulty
    of tracking comments in Google docs to the text, I inserted proposed
    text into the body of the document where the commenter is proposing
    it should go.  All proposed text is denoted by /italics and
    highlighted in yellow/ for ease of reference.  I’m hoping that will
    make it easier to discuss on the call by zeroing in on highlighted
    text.
 2. I have removed references to phases and inserted references to
    gating questions. This text has been highlighted in yellow to note
    that it has been changed.
 3. Proposed gating questions have their numbering highlighted in green.
    There may be other gating questions, but I highlighted the
    originally-proposed gating questions as a starting point.
 4. Donna and I added some comments on what the group appeared to
    converge on during today’s call.
 5. Lastly, I attached the notes from today’s call in case you find
    these helpful as you’re going through the document.

Here is the link to the Google Doc: 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TlcnfYuRhrCKVB28Rvb_ra6mCIWvjUDnJyJhSjbG5_Q/edit

Thank you, and please let me know if there is anything I can do to 
assist in your review of the document.

Kind regards,


Caitlin

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180709/d11dbf62/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 9 July EPDP Scope Team Call.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 153357 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180709/d11dbf62/attachment.docx>