[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Suggested Edits to Scope in the EPDP Charter

[Rafik Dammak]

It is another  Samantha,  the Registries SG Policy vice chair.

Rafik


On Thu, Jul 5, 2018, 3:13 AM Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:

> Samantha from ICANN Legal? How interesting this issue is already being
> discussed with her. Not sure that is even appropriate — we do not want
> an ICANN Legal staff liaison who is not neutral.
>
> Ayden
>
> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 19:52, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Those changes on scope were proposed by keith, it is all about the access
> and phasing. Please review carefully and discuss here.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com>
> Date: Wed, Jul 4, 2018, 12:00 AM
> Subject: Suggested Edits to Scope in the EPDP Charter
> To: marika.konings at icann.org <marika.konings at icann.org>,
> susankpolicy at gmail.com <susankpolicy at gmail.com>, Heather Forrest (
> Heather.Forrest at acu.edu.au) <Heather.Forrest at acu.edu.au>,
> Donna.Austin at team.neustar <Donna.Austin at team.neustar>,
> rafik.dammak at gmail.com<rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> Please find attached some suggested edits to the scope section of the
> Charter, primarily intended to clarify the two-phase approach (Temp Spec
> and then Access Model) and to help identify what issues from Phase 1 are
> gating for Phase 2.
>
>
>
> Susan, I understand you and Samantha chatted about this in Panama, so we
> wanted to follow up with proposed text.
>
>
>
> Let me know if you have any questions, or if this should be added directly
> to the Google doc. Note that the recommendations will impact the timeline
> graphic as noted in the comment on Page 6.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Keith
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180705/65ceb21b/attachment.htm>