[NCSG-PC] Fwd: Suggested Edits to Scope in the EPDP Charter

[Ayden Férdeline]

Samantha from ICANN Legal? How interesting this issue is already being discussed with her. Not sure that is even appropriate — we do not want an ICANN Legal staff liaison who is not neutral.

Ayden

Sent from ProtonMail Mobile

On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 19:52, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Those changes on scope were proposed by keith, it is all about the access and phasing. Please review carefully and discuss here.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Drazek, Keith <kdrazek at verisign.com>
> Date: Wed, Jul 4, 2018, 12:00 AM
> Subject: Suggested Edits to Scope in the EPDP Charter
> To: marika.konings at icann.org <marika.konings at icann.org>, susankpolicy at gmail.com <susankpolicy at gmail.com>, Heather Forrest (Heather.Forrest at acu.edu.au) <Heather.Forrest at acu.edu.au>, Donna.Austin at team.neustar <Donna.Austin at team.neustar>, rafik.dammak at gmail.com<rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find attached some suggested edits to the scope section of the Charter, primarily intended to clarify the two-phase approach (Temp Spec and then Access Model) and to help identify what issues from Phase 1 are gating for Phase 2.
>
> Susan, I understand you and Samantha chatted about this in Panama, so we wanted to follow up with proposed text.
>
> Let me know if you have any questions, or if this should be added directly to the Google doc. Note that the recommendations will impact the timeline graphic as noted in the comment on Page 6.
>
> Best,
>
> Keith
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180704/4e8aa95b/attachment.htm>