<div dir="auto"><div>It is another Samantha, the Registries SG Policy vice chair.<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Rafik </div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, Jul 5, 2018, 3:13 AM Ayden Férdeline <<a href="mailto:icann@ferdeline.com">icann@ferdeline.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>Samantha from ICANN Legal? How interesting this issue is already being discussed with her. Not sure that is even appropriate — we do not want an ICANN Legal staff liaison who is not neutral. </div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>Ayden</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div id="m_3025564741424517803protonmail_mobile_signature_block">Sent from ProtonMail Mobile</div>
<div>
<br>
<div>
<div>
<br>
</div>On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 19:52, Rafik Dammak <<a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<blockquote class="m_3025564741424517803protonmail_quote" type="cite">
<div dir="auto">
<div>Hi all,
<div dir="auto">
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Those changes on scope were proposed by keith, it is all about the access and phasing. Please review carefully and discuss here.</div>
<div dir="auto">
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Best,</div>
<div dir="auto">
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Rafik </div>
<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">---------- Forwarded message ---------
<br>From: Drazek, Keith <<a href="mailto:kdrazek@verisign.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">kdrazek@verisign.com</a>>
<br>Date: Wed, Jul 4, 2018, 12:00 AM
<br>Subject: Suggested Edits to Scope in the EPDP Charter
<br>To: <a href="mailto:marika.konings@icann.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">marika.konings@icann.org</a> <<a href="mailto:marika.konings@icann.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">marika.konings@icann.org</a>>, <a href="mailto:susankpolicy@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">susankpolicy@gmail.com</a> <<a href="mailto:susankpolicy@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">susankpolicy@gmail.com</a>>,
Heather Forrest (<a href="mailto:Heather.Forrest@acu.edu.au" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Heather.Forrest@acu.edu.au</a>) <<a href="mailto:Heather.Forrest@acu.edu.au" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Heather.Forrest@acu.edu.au</a>>, Donna.Austin@team.neustar <Donna.Austin@team.neustar>,
<a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a><<a href="mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">rafik.dammak@gmail.com</a>>
<br>
</div>
<br>
<br>
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="m_3025564741424517803m_2691940656918337949WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi all,<u></u><u></u>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Please find attached some suggested edits to the scope section of the Charter, primarily intended to clarify the two-phase approach (Temp Spec and then Access Model) and to help identify what issues from Phase 1 are gating
for Phase 2.<u></u><u></u>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Susan, I understand you and Samantha chatted about this in Panama, so we wanted to follow up with proposed text.<u></u><u></u>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Let me know if you have any questions, or if this should be added directly to the Google doc. Note that the recommendations will impact the timeline graphic as noted in the comment on Page 6.<u></u><u></u>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Best,<u></u><u></u>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Keith<u></u><u></u>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u>
</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u>
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div></blockquote></div></div></div>