[NCSG-PC] Response to IPC/BC model

[Kathy Kleiman]

It seems a little funny to send me to send a copy directly to 
winterfeldt law -- how about just the first email address?

Also, perhaps we should publish our comment...

Best, Kathy


On 4/5/2018 6:30 PM, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
> They have asked that comments be sent to:
>
> stakeholders can provide written comments on the accreditation model 
> proposal to3amcomments at gmail.com <mailto:3amcomments at gmail.com>, with 
> a copy tointernet at winterfeldt.law <mailto:internet at winterfeldt.law>.
>
>
> I hope all comments will be publicly published. Feels a little odd 
> simply sending this to a Gmail account.
>
> Ayden
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On 6 April 2018 12:27 AM, Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ayden, Good question. I think we should send it to Cherine and 
>> Goran and copy the email address in which Brian Winterfeldt and his 
>> law firm asked for "comments.'
>>
>> /I can't seem to find that email address right now -- would you 
>> happen to have it?/
>>
>> All on the PC, I'm downloading the document shortly for final check 
>> of the citations and formatting. Google doc does not make indented 
>> citations easy :-).  No more edits, please. I'll have this over to 
>> Rafik and Farzi shortly.
>>
>> Best, Kathy
>>
>>
>> On 4/5/2018 6:17 PM, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>>> I understand from the notifications from Google that changes are 
>>> being accepted, that work is still underway editing this document 
>>> and getting it into a submittable state. So I suppose now is the 
>>> time to ask, who are we sending this letter to? BC Chair and IPC 
>>> President, with Goran and Cherine in cc?
>>>
>>> -- Ayden
>>>
>>>
>>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>>> On 4 April 2018 4:09 AM, Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> Tx to Ayden for his excellent edits, now incorporated (with a few 
>>>> comments highlighting proposed rephrasing, Ayden). Tx also to 
>>>> Martin for his review!
>>>>
>>>> Back to the PC to continue review...
>>>>
>>>> Best, Kathy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 4/3/2018 7:40 PM, Martin Pablo Silva Valent wrote:
>>>>> I am reading it now, but between Kathy and Ayden’s work, it looks 
>>>>> good to go. I’ll add my comments if any. So far, my full support.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Martín
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3 Apr 2018, at 20:38, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com 
>>>>>> <mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have reviewed the document now and put forward some suggested 
>>>>>> edits. Some are substantive changes but all are in the same 
>>>>>> spirit of the original text.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The formatting looks a bit odd; I hope the text alignments can be 
>>>>>> corrected prior to submission.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think the conclusion lacks punch; but can’t think of what it is 
>>>>>> missing at the moment...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ayden
>>>>>>
>>>>>> P.S. Thanks to those who drafted it
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 01:24, Rafik Dammak 
>>>>>> <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Farzaneh,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks for this.
>>>>>>> I would like to ask PC members to review it asap.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2018-04-04 6:57 GMT+09:00 farzaneh badii 
>>>>>>> <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com <mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Hi all
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Im on a plane so let me know if the link below is correct.
>>>>>>>     Kathy has written a response on ipc bc
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/16miuxuAYYgwUQHPde8N02W6G84oibuV9m4W3ZTeI_SA
>>>>>>>     <https://docs.google.com/document/d/16miuxuAYYgwUQHPde8N02W6G84oibuV9m4W3ZTeI_SA>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     We need to go through it asap and send it before their meeting.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Please comment quickly and make sure you are on suggestion
>>>>>>>     mode (i set it that way not sure it went through)
>>>>>>>     -- 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     Farzaneh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>     NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>>>>>     NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>>>>>>>     https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>>>>     <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180405/8b460b13/attachment.htm>