[NCSG-PC] Response to IPC/BC model

[Stephanie Perrin]

The whole process is flawed, I think we should send it to the GDPR 
address so that it is put on the web under community feedback on models.

Stephanie

On 2018-04-05 18:36, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
>
> It seems a little funny to send me to send a copy directly to 
> winterfeldt law -- how about just the first email address?
>
> Also, perhaps we should publish our comment...
>
> Best, Kathy
>
>
> On 4/5/2018 6:30 PM, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>> They have asked that comments be sent to:
>>
>> stakeholders can provide written comments on the accreditation model 
>> proposal to3amcomments at gmail.com <mailto:3amcomments at gmail.com>, with 
>> a copy tointernet at winterfeldt.law <mailto:internet at winterfeldt.law>.
>>
>>
>> I hope all comments will be publicly published. Feels a little odd 
>> simply sending this to a Gmail account.
>>
>> Ayden
>>
>>
>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> On 6 April 2018 12:27 AM, Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ayden, Good question. I think we should send it to Cherine and 
>>> Goran and copy the email address in which Brian Winterfeldt and his 
>>> law firm asked for "comments.'
>>>
>>> /I can't seem to find that email address right now -- would you 
>>> happen to have it?/
>>>
>>> All on the PC, I'm downloading the document shortly for final check 
>>> of the citations and formatting. Google doc does not make indented 
>>> citations easy :-).  No more edits, please.  I'll have this over to 
>>> Rafik and Farzi shortly.
>>>
>>> Best, Kathy
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/5/2018 6:17 PM, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>>>> I understand from the notifications from Google that changes are 
>>>> being accepted, that work is still underway editing this document 
>>>> and getting it into a submittable state. So I suppose now is the 
>>>> time to ask, who are we sending this letter to? BC Chair and IPC 
>>>> President, with Goran and Cherine in cc?
>>>>
>>>> -- Ayden
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>>>> On 4 April 2018 4:09 AM, Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> Tx to Ayden for his excellent edits, now incorporated (with a few 
>>>>> comments highlighting proposed rephrasing, Ayden). Tx also to 
>>>>> Martin for his review!
>>>>>
>>>>> Back to the PC to continue review...
>>>>>
>>>>> Best, Kathy
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/3/2018 7:40 PM, Martin Pablo Silva Valent wrote:
>>>>>> I am reading it now, but between Kathy and Ayden’s work, it looks 
>>>>>> good to go. I’ll add my comments if any. So far, my full support.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Martín
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3 Apr 2018, at 20:38, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com 
>>>>>>> <mailto:icann at ferdeline.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have reviewed the document now and put forward some suggested 
>>>>>>> edits. Some are substantive changes but all are in the same 
>>>>>>> spirit of the original text.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The formatting looks a bit odd; I hope the text alignments can 
>>>>>>> be corrected prior to submission.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think the conclusion lacks punch; but can’t think of what it 
>>>>>>> is missing at the moment...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ayden
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> P.S. Thanks to those who drafted it
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 01:24, Rafik Dammak 
>>>>>>> <rafik.dammak at gmail.com <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Farzaneh,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> thanks for this.
>>>>>>>> I would like to ask PC members to review it asap.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2018-04-04 6:57 GMT+09:00 farzaneh badii 
>>>>>>>> <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com <mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Hi all
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Im on a plane so let me know if the link below is correct.
>>>>>>>>     Kathy has written a response on ipc bc
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/16miuxuAYYgwUQHPde8N02W6G84oibuV9m4W3ZTeI_SA
>>>>>>>>     <https://docs.google.com/document/d/16miuxuAYYgwUQHPde8N02W6G84oibuV9m4W3ZTeI_SA>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     We need to go through it asap and send it before their
>>>>>>>>     meeting.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Please comment quickly and make sure you are on suggestion
>>>>>>>>     mode (i set it that way not sure it went through)
>>>>>>>>     -- 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Farzaneh
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>     NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>>>>>>     NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>>>>>>>>     https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>>>>>     <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>>>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180405/6b451445/attachment.htm>