[NCSG-PC] Response to IPC/BC model

[Ayden Férdeline]

They have asked that comments be sent to:

stakeholders can provide written comments on the accreditation model proposal to 3amcomments at gmail.com, with a copy to internet at winterfeldt.law.

I hope all comments will be publicly published. Feels a little odd simply sending this to a Gmail account.

Ayden

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On 6 April 2018 12:27 AM, Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com> wrote:

> Hi Ayden, Good question. I think we should send it to Cherine and Goran and copy the email address in which Brian Winterfeldt and his law firm asked for "comments.'
>
> I can't seem to find that email address right now -- would you happen to have it?
>
> All on the PC, I'm downloading the document shortly for final check of the citations and formatting. Google doc does not make indented citations easy :-).  No more edits, please.  I'll have this over to Rafik and Farzi shortly.
>
> Best, Kathy
>
> On 4/5/2018 6:17 PM, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>
>> I understand from the notifications from Google that changes are being accepted, that work is still underway editing this document and getting it into a submittable state. So I suppose now is the time to ask, who are we sending this letter to? BC Chair and IPC President, with Goran and Cherine in cc?
>>
>> -- Ayden
>>
>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> On 4 April 2018 4:09 AM, Kathy Kleiman [<kathy at kathykleiman.com>](mailto:kathy at kathykleiman.com) wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Tx to Ayden for his excellent edits, now incorporated (with a few comments highlighting proposed rephrasing, Ayden). Tx also to Martin for his review!
>>>
>>> Back to the PC to continue review...
>>>
>>> Best, Kathy
>>>
>>> On 4/3/2018 7:40 PM, Martin Pablo Silva Valent wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am reading it now, but between Kathy and Ayden’s work, it looks good to go. I’ll add my comments if any. So far, my full support.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Martín
>>>>
>>>>> On 3 Apr 2018, at 20:38, Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have reviewed the document now and put forward some suggested edits. Some are substantive changes but all are in the same spirit of the original text.
>>>>>
>>>>> The formatting looks a bit odd; I hope the text alignments can be corrected prior to submission.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the conclusion lacks punch; but can’t think of what it is missing at the moment...
>>>>>
>>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>>
>>>>> Ayden
>>>>>
>>>>> P.S. Thanks to those who drafted it
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 01:24, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Farzaneh,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks for this.
>>>>>> I would like to ask PC members to review it asap.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rafik
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2018-04-04 6:57 GMT+09:00 farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Im on a plane so let me know if the link below is correct. Kathy has written a response on ipc bc
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/16miuxuAYYgwUQHPde8N02W6G84oibuV9m4W3ZTeI_SA
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We need to go through it asap and send it before their meeting.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please comment quickly and make sure you are on suggestion mode (i set it that way not sure it went through) --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Farzaneh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>>>
>>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20180405/c7896398/attachment.htm>