[NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] Placeholder motion for ATRT3 nominations

[Dr. Tatiana Tropina]

Ayden, all,

I am also very much surprised that Michael is not in the pool of three
highest ranked candidates -- taken into account his work in
accountability CCWG and his lead in transparency subgroup. Furthermore,
I am not very happy to find myself ranked higher in order of preference.
I know that we might discuss the gender balance here, but if the
question is who gets on the review team if there are additional places -
I am ready to withdraw my application if Michael's appointment will
depend on this in case of free places. As he is the next after me in
ranking, may be it's the best thing to do to guarantee a place for him
in case of additional slots. I really think he would be a great addition
to the review team with all his experience and expertise.

Warm regards,

Tanya


On 09/09/17 12:42, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
> I have just reviewed the SSC's mailing list, and am concerned with the
> ranking of candidates. For a Review Team designed to help improve the
> transparency and accountability of ICANN, I am surprised that Michael
> Karanicolas has not been ranked higher by the SSC. I trust that our
> representatives on the SSC are working to ensure the GNSO's
> nominations are balanced and qualified, but given we only have the
> power to 'force' through three representatives, I'd have hoped Michael
> would rank a little higher. I also think at least one of the three
> should be female, but that being said I am not familiar with the
> candidate pool of those who applied.
>
> Just my thoughts; I am certainly not looking to undermine the
> dedicated work of our appointed representatives on the SSC.
>
> —Ayden 
>
>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] Placeholder motion for ATRT3
>> nominations
>> Local Time: 9 September 2017 5:38 AM
>> UTC Time: 9 September 2017 04:38
>> From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
>> To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>> ncsg-pc <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>
>>
>>
>> Phew....
>>
>>
>> On 2017-09-09 00:32, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> There was no nomination , candidates applied directly.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Rafik 
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 9, 2017 1:23 PM, "Stephanie Perrin"
>>> <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
>>> <mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Uh....did I miss us doing this?  WHo have we nominated??
>>>
>>>     cheers steph
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>>     Subject:
>>>     	[council] Placeholder motion for ATRT3 nominations
>>>     Date:
>>>     	Fri, 8 Sep 2017 13:44:11 -0700
>>>     From:
>>>     	Susan Kawaguchi <susankpolicy at gmail.com>
>>>     <mailto:susankpolicy at gmail.com>
>>>     To:
>>>     	council at gnso.icann.org <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     Hello All, 
>>>
>>>     The SSC respectfully submits the attached placeholder motion for
>>>     the ATRT3 nominations. 
>>>
>>>     We are continuing our deliberations but will have the
>>>     recommended nominations to submit to the GNSO Council early next
>>>     week. 
>>>
>>>     Best regards, 
>>>
>>>     Susan Kawaguchi
>>>     Chair - SSC
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     NCSG-PC mailing list
>>>     NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is>
>>>     https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>     <https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc>
>>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCSG-PC mailing list
> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170909/1f9106ec/attachment.htm>