[NCSG-PC] Draft comment of CCNSO review deferral / Review&Endorsment

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Ayden,

Thanks,
I saw the comments but they look like questions for me and I cannot really
respond to them. I think that they were made by Stephanie, maybe she can
propose some edits there?
I am happy to delay and hold for few hours the submission if we can get
some wording and edits to be considered to change the tone.

Best,

Rafik

2017-05-20 6:49 GMT+09:00 Ayden Férdeline <icann at ferdeline.com>:

> Hi Rafik,
>
> Just a quick clarification; I support the sentiment of the comment, but as
> Stephanie alluded to, think it would be better if we are slightly more
> tactful in the comment that we send through. I also note that an anonymous
> commenter left some useful comments in the Google Doc.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Ayden Férdeline
> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>
>
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:45 pm, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Stephanie,
>
> Thanks for the comment,
> I can understand we have support from Ed, Matt, Ayden, Stephanie and
> myself for submitting the comment with no objection. also, support from
> Avri as an observer. I interpret this as having consensus to send the
> draft.
> if there is no strong objections in next hours, I will submit the comment
> on behalf of NCSG (document attached).
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
> 2017-05-20 6:27 GMT+09:00 Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.
> utoronto.ca>:
>
>> I think it is worded too strongly, but I will support it.
>>
>> Stephanie
>>
>> On 2017-05-19 16:52, Rafik Dammak wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> so  I see there is more endorsement for opposing the deferral and we have
>> the new draft here https://docs.google.com/d
>> ocument/d/1RILiprppZVCC2J9K1YnNXWU2wsMgqVPjDg1rDrWoQl4/edit
>> can you please express your position quickly so we can submit the comment
>> in due time. I will also share the new draft in NCSG list.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> 2017-05-19 23:39 GMT+09:00 avri doria <avri at apc.org>:
>>
>>>
>>> i also do not support postponement.
>>>
>>> avri
>>>
>>>
>>> On 19-May-17 04:51, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > My initial reaction is, I do not support the postponement of mandatory
>>> > Reviews. If there is a compelling reason for why this should happen, I
>>> > would be interested in hearing it.
>>> >
>>> > Many thanks,
>>> >
>>> > Ayden
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> -------- Original Message --------
>>> >> Subject: [NCSG-PC] Draft comment of CCNSO review deferral /
>>> >> Review&Endorsment
>>> >> Local Time: May 19, 2017 12:52 AM
>>> >> UTC Time: May 18, 2017 11:52 PM
>>> >> From: rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>> >> To: ncsg-pc <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi all,
>>> >>
>>> >> I am sharing here the draft made by Arshad about ccNSO review
>>> >> deferral  https://docs.google.com/docume
>>> nt/d/1ZZOFEBt1xbRblheuIvBdSXxFqXiEBiesFflka6Rtk7I/edit?usp=sharing
>>> >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZZOFEBt1xbRblheuIvBdSXx
>>> FqXiEBiesFflka6Rtk7I/edit?usp=sharing>.
>>> >>
>>> >> I understand that Ed objected to the content and explained his point
>>> >> of view on NCSG mailing list
>>> >> https://listserv.syr.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=NCSG-DISCUSS;9ee80ad7.1705
>>> .
>>> >>
>>> >> I need to hear from others about their positions and also any
>>> >> suggestion on how to accommodate the 2 opposite views in the NCSG
>>> >> comment i.e what can be the consensual position for NCSG here.
>>> >>
>>> >> the deadline for submission is also the 19th May and so we have less
>>> >> than 24hours to review and suggest a way to move forward.
>>> >>
>>> >> Best,
>>> >>
>>> >> Rafik
>>> >>
>>> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> >> From: *Rafik Dammak* <rafik.dammak at gmail.com
>>> >> <mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
>>> >> Date: 2017-05-17 11:38 GMT+09:00
>>> >> Subject: Draft comment of CCNSO review deferral / Consultation
>>> >> To: "NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu
>>> >> <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>"
>>> >> <NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu
>>> >> <mailto:NCSG-DISCUSS at listserv.syr.edu>>, ncsg-pc
>>> >> <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is <mailto:ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi all,
>>> >>
>>> >> Arshad kindly drafted and shared his draft for NCSG
>>> >> comment https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZZOFEBt1xbRblheuIvBdSXxF
>>> qXiEBiesFflka6Rtk7I/edit?usp=sharing
>>> >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZZOFEBt1xbRblheuIvBdSXx
>>> FqXiEBiesFflka6Rtk7I/edit?usp=sharing>.
>>> >>
>>> >> Please review it, add your comments, express your support or not in
>>> >> order to assess what we have the common NCSG position on this topics
>>> >> and submitting in time. the deadline for submission is this Friday
>>> >> 19th May.
>>> >>
>>> >> Best.
>>> >>
>>> >> Rafik
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> > NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> > https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>
>>> ______________________________ _________________
>>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing listNCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.ishttps://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________ _________________
>> NCSG-PC mailing list
>> NCSG-PC at lists.ncsg.is
>> https://lists.ncsg.is/mailman/listinfo/ncsg-pc
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170520/c2c5ba53/attachment.htm>