[NCSG-PC] Open Public comments
Edward Morris
egmorris1 at toast.net
Thu Feb 23 02:44:33 EET 2017
Hi Rafik,
On the Transparency public comments, as well as other public comments
related to the CCWG - Accountability, might I suggest delegating that to
Robin's Accountability group. There are going to be about a dozen public
comments coming out of the CCWG over the next half year. It might be best
to split those off of the general public comments and organise them
initially within the NCSG Accountability group. Robin's done a fantastic
job organising our CCWG comments in the past - we have a call next Tuesday
and that would probably be a good place to get started on it.
Just a suggestion - as Michael is a co-chair of the Transparency group and
is part of the NCSG Accountability group that might be a resource we could
use for informational purposes there.
Thanks for getting on top of all of these comments.
Best,
Ed
----------------------------------------
From: "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 12:25 AM
To: "ncsg-pc" <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Open Public comments
Hi everyone,
From the Public Comments page, I picked the 3 consultations that seem
relevant for us and we had some discussion about. this is kind of planning
for us to cover public comments:
GNSO Initial Report on the IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection
Mechanisms Policy Development Process,
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/igo-ingo , deadline 1 Mar 2017
At-Large Review: Draft Report,
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/atlarge-review-draft-report-2017-02-01
-en, deadline 24 Mar 2017 Recommendations to Improve ICANN's
Transparency,
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-acct-draft-recs-2017-02-21-en ,
deadline 10 Apr 2017
the first consultation is quite close, less than 1 week and the topic is
important for us. We have an urgent need to get a volunteer to draft a
quick comment. I am wondering if Kathy can jump in here. In any case, as PC
we will have to act quickly if we get a statement to review.
for at-large review, I would like to volunteer Ayden since he followed the
discussion closely and read the report. @Ayden can you please start
drafting and share the document with the wider NCSG list for consultation?
for the last one, related to ICANN accountability work, it will be great
to have someone involved in the CCWG to take the lead here. Maybe Matthew?
while I am suggesting names among those in PC List, we can try to find
other members take the lead or help.
in term of planning for future public comments, we can follow upcoming
consultations here
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/upcoming-2012-02-25-en to get an idea
about what is coming (dates are of course tentative).
there is also this separate page about "operational" public comments
https://www.icann.org/public-comments-operational , something to follow
more closely.
Best,
Rafik
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170222/e7e66908/attachment.htm>
More information about the NCSG-PC
mailing list