[NCSG-PC] Open Public comments

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Ed,

thanks for the response and suggestion. I added Robin in cc.
I am happy if the group manage to cover any upcoming public comments from
CCWG, while the NCSG PC still should follow closely and be ready for review
and endorsement.

@Robin can you please liaise with us for any CCWG ws2 related comments that
NCSG needs to submit a statement on.

Best,

Rafik

2017-02-23 9:44 GMT+09:00 Edward Morris <egmorris1 at toast.net>:

> Hi Rafik,
>
> On the Transparency public comments, as well as other public comments
> related to the CCWG - Accountability, might I suggest delegating that to
> Robin's Accountability group. There are going to be about a dozen public
> comments coming out of the CCWG over the next half year. It might be best
> to split those off of the general public comments and organise them
> initially within the NCSG Accountability group.  Robin's done a fantastic
> job organising our CCWG comments in the past - we have a call next Tuesday
> and that would probably be a good place to get started on it.
>
> Just a suggestion - as Michael is a co-chair of the Transparency group and
> is part of the NCSG Accountability group that might be a resource we could
> use for informational purposes there.
>
> Thanks for getting on top of all of these comments.
>
> Best,
>
> Ed
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From*: "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
> *Sent*: Thursday, February 23, 2017 12:25 AM
> *To*: "ncsg-pc" <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>
> *Subject*: [NCSG-PC] Open Public comments
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> From the Public Comments page, I picked the 3 consultations that
> seem relevant for us and we had some discussion about. this is kind of
> planning for us to cover public comments:
>
>    1. GNSO Initial Report on the IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights
>    Protection Mechanisms Policy Development Process, https://www.icann.org
>    /public-comments/igo-ingo , deadline *1 Mar 2017 *
>    2. At-Large Review: Draft Report,  https://www.icann.org/public-
>    comments/atlarge-review-draft-report-2017-02-01-en
>    <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/atlarge-review-draft-report-2017-02-01-en>,
>    deadline *24 Mar 2017 *
>    3. Recommendations to Improve ICANN's Transparency,
>    https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-acct-draft-recs-2
>    017-02-21-en
>    <https://www.icann.org/public-comments/ccwg-acct-draft-recs-2017-02-21-en>
>    , deadline *10 Apr 2017 *
>
> the first consultation is quite close, less than 1 week and the topic is
> important for us. We have an urgent need to get a volunteer to draft a
> quick comment. I am wondering if Kathy can jump in here. In any case, as PC
> we will have to act quickly if we get a statement to review.
>
> for at-large review, I would like to volunteer Ayden since he followed the
> discussion closely and read the report. @Ayden can you please start
> drafting and share the document with the wider NCSG list for consultation?
>
> for the last one, related to ICANN accountability work, it will be great
> to have someone involved in the CCWG to take the lead here. Maybe Matthew?
>
> while I am suggesting names among those in PC List, we can try to find
> other members take the lead or help.
>
> in term of planning for future public comments, we can follow upcoming
> consultations here https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/upcoming-2012-
> 02-25-en to get an idea about what is coming (dates are of course
> tentative).
>
> there is also this separate page about "operational" public comments
> https://www.icann.org/public-comments-operational , something to follow
> more closely.
>
> Best,
>
> Rafik
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170223/dd81752e/attachment.htm>