[NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] RDS Scope Guidance

[Ayden Férdeline]

It is interesting to read that the call may be re-opened yet again for volunteers to serve on the Review team; my understanding was that it had been re-opened three times already.

I would prefer that a comprehensive Review be undertaken, but I appreciate it may not be the best allocation of the community’s resources. For that reason, I’m okay with a condensed timeline as long as we are not glazing over important issues that should indeed be reviewed. That said, I'm not entirely clear on what is in-scope as part of the compressed and comprehensive Review options — it would be useful if Staff could prepare a comparison table which clarifies what would be in-scope for each option.

What I don’t want is for the Review team to be brought onboard for six months and rushed to reach or (re)affirm a pre-determined conclusion. I worry about this when I see sentences like, “The scope be limited to “post mortem” of implementation results of the previous WHOIS review recommendations.” That sounds very restrictive to me.

I thought IPC or someone else said a few months ago that a condensed Review would not be in line with the Bylaws. I can’t remember where I read or heard this (it is also possible that I am imagining it) – does anyone else remember this being raised?

- Ayden


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [NCSG-PC] Fwd: [council] RDS Scope Guidance
Local Time: 20 February 2017 11:15 PM
UTC Time: 20 February 2017 23:15
From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca
To: ncsg-pc <ncsg-pc at lists.ncsg.is>, Kathy Kleiman <kathy at kathykleiman.com>



Please note this is our last kick at this can. I really don't have much guidance; I don't quite understand exactly what we are going to study.....but I like the idea of 6 months. Copying Kathy who co-chaired the last one, she is most likely to be able to figure out if this will work....


Stephanie




-------- Forwarded Message --------

Subject:
[council] RDS Scope Guidance

Date:
Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:31:56 +0000

From:
James M. Bladel [<jbladel at godaddy.com>](mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com)

To:
GNSO Council List [<council at gnso.icann.org>](mailto:council at gnso.icann.org)




Councilors –





Attached, please find a draft RDS Scope Guidance document, which consolidates the feedback received from all SOs and ACs on guidance/recommendations to limit the scope of the upcoming RDS (WHOIS) review. Time is tight, so if you have any comments or edits, please respond by 2000 UTC this Friday 24 FEB.





Once completed, the RDS Scope Guidance document will be distributed to RDS Review Team applicants, to confirm that they are still interested in serving on this review team. There is also a proposal to extend the call for applications until 7 MAR.





Thank you,





J.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-pc/attachments/20170220/2f578338/attachment.htm>